PMI Updated PMP Exam Questions and Answers by niko

A user focus group is a group of potential or actual customers who provide feedback on a product or service. User focus groups can help project managers understand the needs, preferences, and expectations of the target market, as well as identify any problems or issues with the product or service12.

Defining a user focus group as external stakeholders with a high influence on outcomes means that the project manager recognizes the importance of involving the users in the project initiation and planning phases. By doing so, the project manager can ensure that the project aligns with the user requirements and delivers value to the customers34.

Defining a user focus group as external stakeholders also implies that the project manager will communicate with them regularly, solicit their feedback, and incorporate their suggestions into the project scope, schedule, budget, and quality5 . This can help prevent customer dissatisfaction and negative feedback, as well as increase customer loyalty and retention .

The project manager should arrange a meeting with the functional managers of the two teams and try to reach an agreement that will resolve the conflict and enable the teams to complete their tasks. This is the best option because it addresses the issue directly, involves the parties who have the authority and responsibility to make decisions, and seeks a collaborative and constructive solution. The project manager should act as a facilitator and mediator in the meeting, and help the functional managers to identify the sources of the conflict, the interests and needs of each party, and the possible options for agreement. The project manager should also ensure that the meeting is conducted in a respectful and professional manner, and that the outcome is documented and communicated to the relevant stakeholders. References:

People in Projects, Chapter 13, Section 5: Project Manager/Functional Manager Conflict

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), Chapter 13, Section 4.2.3: Conflict Management

7 Big Project Management Conflicts & Ways to Solve Them All, Section 2: Conflicting Interests of Stakeholders

The project manager should do first to manage the budget is to meet with the project team to analyze the actual cost to determine deviations. This is the first step in the control cost process, which involves monitoring the status of the project to update the project costs and manage changes to the cost baseline2. By analyzing the actual cost, the project manager can identify the causes and sources of the cost variance, and evaluate the impact and implications on the project performance and objectives. The project manager can also use various tools and techniques, such as earned value analysis, forecasting, and variance analysis, to measure and report the cost performance and status2. Based on the analysis, the project manager can then decide on the appropriate actions and responses to bring the project back on track, such as requesting additional funds, reducing scope, adjusting resources, or implementing corrective or preventive actions2.

Option A is not a good choice, because it is premature and passive. The project manager should not ask the project sponsor for assistance in getting the budget back on track before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first understand the nature and extent of the cost variance, and then present the facts and data to the project sponsor, along with possible solutions and recommendations. The project manager should also demonstrate their own initiative and responsibility in managing the budget, rather than relying on the project sponsor to solve the problem.

Option C is not a good choice, because it is pessimistic and irresponsible. The project manager should not inform the stakeholders that the project will be finished over budget before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first assess the situation and explore the options to improve the cost performance and meet the budget expectations. The project manager should also communicate the cost status and issues to the stakeholders in a timely and transparent manner, and seek their feedback and support, rather than delivering bad news without any justification or action plan.

Option D is not a good choice, because it is hasty and presumptuous. The project manager should not issue a change request including the analysis to increase the budget before analyzing the actual cost and determining the deviations. The project manager should first verify the accuracy and validity of the cost data, and evaluate the feasibility and necessity of increasing the budget. The project manager should also consider the impact of the change request on the project scope, schedule, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction, and obtain the approval of the change control board before implementing the change2.

The project manager should meet with the subject matter experts (SMEs) to assess the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The SMEs are the ones who have the knowledge and expertise to understand the implications of the new regulation and how it affects the project deliverables. The project manager should also involve the stakeholders, especially the project sponsor and the customer, in the assessment process to ensure their expectations and requirements are met. The project manager should then use the assessment results to determine the best course of action to address the change, such as modifying the project plan, requesting a change request, or escalating the issue to the appropriate authority. The project manager should follow the change management process as defined in the project management plan and the business analysis plan, and document the changes and their impacts in the project documents and the traceability matrix. The project manager should also communicate the changes and their impacts to the project team and the stakeholders, and obtain their buy-in and support.

The other options are not the best actions to take next, because they do not address the impact of the new regulation on the project objectives and deliverables. Consulting with the project sponsor to discuss a cost increase (option A) may be premature, as the cost impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Acquiring approval for an exception to the implementation of the new regulation (option B) may not be feasible or desirable, as it may compromise the compliance and quality of the project deliverables. Getting approval for the additional budget from the steering committee (option C) may also be premature, as the budget impact may not be known until the assessment is done. Moreover, the budget approval may not be sufficient to address the other impacts of the new regulation, such as scope, schedule, quality, and risk. References:

The PMI Guide to Business Analysis Includes The Standard for Business Analysis, Chapter 5: Solution Evaluation, Section 5.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 7: Solution Evaluation, Section 7.3.3: Assess Solution Limitations

Business Analysis Techniques: 72 Essential Tools For Success, Chapter 5: Strategy Analysis, Section 5.13: Impact Analysis

Seven Steps to Mastering Business Analysis, Chapter 9: Solution Assessment and Validation