PMI Updated PMP Exam Questions and Answers by dana

In an agile environment, when a team encounters a technical problem, it is essential to engage the team in a problem-solving session to collaboratively find a solution. This approach aligns with the agile principle of self-organizing teams that are empowered to address challenges and adapt their work accordingly. Organizing a retrospective could be beneficial, but it is typically done after a sprint is completed to reflect on what went well and what could be improved. In this case, addressing the problem promptly within the sprint is crucial to maintain the momentum and ensure the team can move forward without delay.

 The project manager should invite the product owner to attend daily standup meetings so they can assess progress. This is the best option because it allows the product owner to stay informed and involved in the project without disrupting the team members throughout the day. Daily standup meetings are a common agile practice that provide a brief and focused update on the project status, issues, and plans1. By inviting the product owner to these meetings, the project manager can address their concerns and expectations, as well as foster collaboration and trust between the product owner and the team. This option also aligns with the agile principle of "business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project"2.

The other options are not as effective as option A. Option B is not frequent enough to satisfy the product owner’s need for information and involvement. Option C is not collaborative and may create conflict between the product owner and the project manager. Option D is not appropriate and may damage the relationship between the product owner and the team. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 540 2: Agile Manifesto, [Principles behind the Agile Manifesto]

According to the PMBOK Guide, an issue is “a point or matter in question or in dispute, or a point or matter that is not settled and is under discussion or over which there are opposing views or disagreements” (p. 720). Issues can arise from any aspect of the project, such as changes, risks, quality, stakeholders, etc. The issue log is a project document that records and tracks the issues that affect the project, along with their status, resolution, and ownership. The issue log is updated throughout the project as new issues are identified, analyzed, and resolved.

In this question, the change in environmental regulations is an external factor that could affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or other aspects. Therefore, it is an issue that needs to be documented and tracked in the issue log. The project manager should update the issue log as an immediate action to ensure that the issue is properly addressed and communicated to the relevant stakeholders. Updating the issue log will also help the project manager to monitor and control the project performance and take corrective or preventive actions as needed.

Updating the project baseline, the risk management plan, or the change request log are not immediate actions that the project manager should take in this situation. The project baseline is the approved version of the project scope, schedule, and cost that serves as a reference for measuring and reporting the project performance. The project baseline can only be changed through the formal change control process, which requires a change request. The risk management plan is a subsidiary plan of the project management plan that describes how risk management activities will be planned, implemented, and monitored throughout the project. The risk management plan can also be changed through the change control process, if necessary. The change request log is a project document that records and tracks the change requests that are submitted, reviewed, approved, or rejected during the project. A change request is a formal proposal to modify any document, deliverable, or baseline of the project.

The project manager may need to update the project baseline, the risk management plan, or the change request log later, after analyzing the impact of the issue and determining the appropriate response. However, these are not immediate actions that the project manager should take before updating the issue log. References:

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Project Management Institute, 2017, pp. 123, 129, 152, 456, 720.

PMP Sample Test Questions, Project Management Institute, 2019, p. 15.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager should ensure that the project benefits are aligned with the business objectives and the needs of the intended users1. One of the best ways to achieve this is to conduct a review with a representative group of users who can provide feedback on the program’s functionality, usability, and value2. This can help the project manager validate the program’s benefits, identify any gaps or issues, and implement any changes or improvements before releasing the program to the public3.

Option A is not the best answer because testing the program only ensures its quality, but not its benefits. Testing the program may reveal technical errors or defects, but it may not capture the user’s perspective or satisfaction4. Option C is not the best answer because meeting with government officials may ensure the program’s compliance, but not its benefits. Meeting with government officials may help the project manager understand the policy requirements and regulations, but it may not reflect the user’s expectations or preferences5. Option D is not the best answer because documenting the features and updating the specifications only ensures the program’s scope, but not its benefits. Documenting the features and updating the specifications may help the project manager control the program’s deliverables, but it may not measure the program’s outcomes or value6. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 332 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 1503 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 1234 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 2875 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 396 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 141.