Amazon Web Services Updated SAA-C03 Exam Questions and Answers by cerys

Migrate the database to Amazon Aurora MySQL - this will let the DB scale on it's own; it'll scale automatically without needing adjustment. Create AMI of the web app and using a launch template - this will make the creating of any future instances of the app seamless. They can then be added to the auto scaling group which will save them money as it will scale up and down based on demand. Using a spot fleet to launch instances- This solves the "MOST cost-effective" portion of the question as spot instances come at a huge discount at the cost of being terminated at any time Amazon deems fit. I think this is why there's a bit of disagreement on this. While it's the most cost effective, it would be a terrible choice if amazon were to terminate that spot instance during a busy period.

This solution meets the requirements of creating digital copies for a large collection of historical written records, analyzing the documents, extracting the medical information, and storing the documents so that an application can run SQL queries on the data. Writing the document information to an Amazon S3 bucket can provide scalable and durable storage for the scanned files. Using Amazon Athena to query the data can provide serverless and interactive SQL analysis on data stored in S3. Creating an AWS Lambda function that runs when new documents are uploaded can provide event-driven and serverless processing of the scanned files. Using Amazon Textract to convert the documents to raw text can provide accurate optical character recognition (OCR) and extraction of structured data such as tables and forms from documents using artificial intelligence (AI). Using Amazon Comprehend Medical to detect and extract relevant medical information from the text can provide natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning that has been pre-trained to understand and extract health data from medical text.

Option A is incorrect because writing the document information to an Amazon EC2 instance that runs a MySQL database can increase the infrastructure overhead and complexity, and it may not be able to handle large volumes of data. Option C is incorrect because creating an Auto Scaling group of Amazon EC2 instances to run a custom application that processes the scanned files and extracts the medical information can increase the infrastructure overhead and complexity, and it may not be able to leverage existing AI and NLP services such as Textract and Comprehend Medical. Option D is incorrect because using Amazon Rekognition to convert the documents to raw text can provide image and video analysis, but it does not support OCR or extraction of structured data from documents. Using Amazon Transcribe Medical to detect and extract relevant medical information from the text can provide speech-to-text transcription service for medical conversations, but it does not support text analysis or extraction of health data from medical text.

References:

https://aws.amazon.com/s3/

https://aws.amazon.com/athena/

https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/

https://aws.amazon.com/textract/

https://aws.amazon.com/comprehend/medical/

This solution meets the requirements of directing users to a backup static error page if the primary website is unavailable, minimizing changes and infrastructure overhead. Route 53 active-passive failover configuration can route traffic to a primary resource when it is healthy or to a secondary resource when the primary resource is unhealthy. Route 53 health checks can monitor the health of the ALB endpoint and trigger the failover when needed. The static error page can be hosted in an S3 bucket that is configured as a website, which is a simple and cost-effective way to serve static content.

Option A is incorrect because using a latency routing policy can route traffic based on the lowest network latency for users, but it does not provide failover functionality. Option C is incorrect because using an active-active configuration with the ALB and an EC2 instance can increase the infrastructure overhead and complexity, and it does not guarantee that the EC2 instance will always be healthy. Option D is incorrect because using a multivalue answer routing policy can return multiple values for a query, but it does not provide failover functionality.

References:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy-failover.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/dns-failover.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/WebsiteHosting.html

To meet the new requirement of transferring files over a private route, the EC2 instances should be moved to private subnets, which do not have direct access to the internet. This ensures that the traffic for file transfers does not go over the internet. To enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3, a VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 can be created. VPC endpoints allow resources within a VPC to communicate with resources in other services without the traffic being sent over the internet. By linking the VPC endpoint to the route table for the private subnets, the EC2 instances can access Amazon S3 over a private connection within the VPC.