Amazon Web Services Updated SAA-C03 Exam Questions and Answers by sufyan

AWS Shield is a managed service that provides protection against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks for applications running on AWS. AWS Shield Standard is automatically enabled to all AWS customers at no additional cost. AWS Shield Advanced is an optional paid service. AWS Shield Advanced provides additional protections against more sophisticated and larger attacks for your applications running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon CloudFront, AWS Global Accelerator, and Route 53.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/w af/latest/developerguide/ddos-event-mitigation-logic-gax.html

This option is the most efficient because it uses AWS Storage Gateway, which is a service that connects an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage to provide seamless integration with data security features between your on-premises IT environment and the AWS storage infrastructure1. It also uses a stored volume gateway, which is a type of volume gateway that stores your primary data locally and asynchronously backs up point-in-time snapshots of your data to Amazon S32. It also runs the Storage Gateway software application on premises and maps the gateway storage volumes to on-premises storage, which enables you to use your existing storage hardware and network infrastructure. It also mounts the gateway storage volumes to provide local access to the data, which ensures that your data is available for low latency access on premises while also getting backed up to AWS. This solution meets the requirement of maintaining local access to all the data while it is backed up on AWS and ensuring that the data backed up on AWS is automatically and securely transferred. Option A is less efficient because it uses AWS Snowball, which is a physical device that lets you transfer large amounts of data into and out of AWS3. However, this does not provide a periodic backup solution, as it requires manual handling and shipping of the device. It also configures on-premises systems to mount the Snowball S3 endpoint to provide local access to the data, which could introduce additional complexity and latency. Option B is less efficient because it uses AWS Snowball Edge, which is a physical device that has onboard storage and compute capabilities for select AWS capabilities. However, this does not provide a periodic backup solution, as it requires manual handling and shipping of the device. It also uses the Snowball Edge file interface to provide on-premises systems with local access to the data, which could introduce additional complexity and latency. Option C is less efficient because it uses AWS Storage Gateway and configures a cached volume gateway, which is a type of volume gateway that stores your primary data in Amazon S3 and retains a copy of frequently accessed data subsets locally. However, this does not provide local access to all the data, as only some data subsets are cached locally. It also configures a percentage of data to cache locally, which could incur higher costs and complexity than using a stored volume gateway.

This answer is correct because it provides a resilient and durable replacement for the on-premises file share that is compatible with Windows IIS web servers. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed service that provides shared file storage built on Windows Server. It supports the SMB protocol and integrates with Microsoft Active Directory, which enables seamless access and authentication for Windows-based applications. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server also offers the following benefits:

Resilience: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server can be deployed in multiple Availability Zones, which provides high availability and failover protection. It also supports automatic backups and restores, as well as self-healing features that detect and correct issues.

Durability: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server replicates data within and across Availability Zones, and stores data on highly durable storage devices. It also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as file access auditing and data deduplication.

Performance: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server delivers consistent sub-millisecond latencies and high throughput for file operations. It also supports SSD storage, native Windows features such as Distributed File System (DFS) Namespaces and Replication, and user-driven performance scaling.

By configuring the Amazon FSx file share to use an AWS KMS CMK to encrypt the images in the file share, the company can protect the images from unauthorized access and comply with company policy. By using NTFS permission sets on the images, the company can prevent accidental deletion of the images by restricting who can modify or delete them.

References:

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server

Using Microsoft Windows file shares

This option is the most efficient because it uses data filters, which are specifications that restrict access to certain data in query results and engines integrated with Lake Formation1. Data filters can be used to implement row-level security and cell-level security, which are techniques to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitive information2. Data filters can be applied when granting Lake Formation permissions on a Data Catalog table, and can use PartiQL expressions to filter data based on conditions3. This solution meets the requirement of providing a secure solution to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitive information. Option A is less efficient because it uses an IAM role that includes permissions to access Lake Formation tables, which is a way to grant access to data in Lake Formation using IAM policies4. However, this does not provide a way to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitive information. Option C is less efficient because it uses an AWS Lambda function that removes sensitive information before Lake Formation ingests the data, which is a way to perform data cleansing or transformation using serverless functions. However, this could involve significant changes to the application code and logic, and could also result in data loss or inconsistency. Option D is less efficient because it uses an AWS Lambda function that periodically queries and removes sensitive information from Lake Formation tables, which is a way to perform data cleansing or transformation using serverless functions. However, this could involve significant changes to the application code and logic, and could also result in data loss or inconsistency.