Isaca Updated CGEIT Exam Questions and Answers by baxter

Managing resources as part of the portfolio strategy would best help to ensure the appropriate allocation of IT resources to support an enterprise’s mission. This is because the portfolio strategy aligns the IT investments with the business goals and priorities, and ensures that the IT resources are allocated to the most valuable and strategic initiatives. By managing resources at the portfolio level, the enterprise can optimize the use of its IT resources across multiple programs and projects, and avoid resource conflicts, shortages, or wastages. A resource strategy as part of program management, prioritizing program requirements based on existing resources, and resource planning for each IT project are all useful practices, but they are not sufficient to ensure the appropriate allocation of IT resources at the enterprise level. They may only focus on the resource needs and constraints of specific programs or projects, and may not consider the overall alignment and optimization of IT resources with the enterprise’s mission. References := IT Portfolio Management: A Practitioner’s Guide - ISACA, Resource Allocation Done Right: Best Practices for 2022 & Beyond, A Complete Guide to Resource Allocation in Projects - Float

The best approach for a CIO to ensure IT executes against an approved strategy is to request IT senior leaders to collectively plan tactics for execution. This collaborative approach leverages the expertise and insights of senior IT leaders to develop a cohesive and aligned plan that supports the strategic objectives. Collective planning fosters ownership and commitment among leaders, ensuring that execution tactics are well-coordinated and aligned with the overall IT strategy. While asking project management to define activities, having leaders independently develop team goals, and providing specific task direction are important, the collective planning by IT senior leaders ensures a strategic and unified approach to execution.

Principles and policies are the best way to convey IT governance direction and objectives, as they provide a clear and consistent framework for decision making, behavior, and actions in the organization. Principles are the fundamental statements that guide the IT governance process and reflect the values and beliefs of the organization. Policies are the specific rules and procedures that implement the principles and ensure compliance with the IT governance objectives12.

Skills and competencies are the abilities and knowledge that enable the IT staff to perform their roles and responsibilities effectively. They are important for achieving IT governance objectives, but they do not convey them directly. Skills and competencies are developed through training, education, and experience3.

Corporate culture is the shared set of norms, beliefs, and values that influence the behavior and attitudes of the organization’s members. Corporate culture can support or hinder IT governance, depending on how well it aligns with the IT governance objectives. Corporate culture is influenced by leadership, communication, and incentives4.

Business processes are the activities and tasks that deliver value to the organization’s customers and stakeholders. Business processes are aligned with the IT governance objectives to ensure efficiency, effectiveness, and quality. Business processes are designed, executed, monitored, and improved using various methods and tools5.

References: 1: What is IT governance? A formal way to align IT & business strategy | CIO1 2: IT Governance: Definition, Frameworks, and Best Practices - InvGate2 3: IT Governance Framework in ITSM - KnowledgeHut4 4: Corporate governance of information technology - Wikipedia3 5: What Is IT Governance? Definition, Practices and Frameworks5

The best way to ensure that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process is to confirm process owners’ acceptance of residual risk. Residual risk is the risk that remains after applying controls or mitigating measures to reduce the original risk1. Process owners are the individuals or groups that are responsible for the design, execution, and performance of a business process2. By confirming process owners’ acceptance of residual risk, the enterprise can ensure that the security risk associated with the policy exception is understood, acknowledged, and agreed upon by the relevant stakeholders. This can also help to assign accountability and liability for the potential consequences of the policy exception, as well as to monitor and review the risk level and the effectiveness of the controls or mitigating measures. The other options are not as effective as confirming process owners’ acceptance of residual risk for ensuring that security risk is properly addressed when implementing an information security policy exception process. Performing an internal and external network penetration test is a useful technique for identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in the network infrastructure, but it does not address the specific security risk related to the policy exception. Obtaining IT security approval on security policy exceptions is a necessary step for validating and authorizing the policy exception, but it does not ensure that the process owners are aware of and accept the residual risk. Benchmarking policy against industry best practice is a good practice for comparing and improving the policy quality and performance, but it does not address the security risk associated with the policy exception.