CIMA Updated F3 Exam Questions and Answers by sylvie

Current PBIT = $25m

Existing debt = $60m at 5% → interest = 0.05 × 60 = $3m

Current interest cover = 25 / 3 = 8.3 times (as stated).

New borrowing: $20m at 10% → extra interest = 0.10 × 20 = $2m

Total interest after borrowing = 3 + 2 = $5m

PBIT in first year is unchanged at $25m, so:

New interest cover=255=5 times\text{New interest cover} = \frac{25}{5} = 5 \text{ times}New interest cover=525​=5 times

Loan covenant requires minimum cover of 4 times. New cover (5x) is above this, so covenant is not breached.

Correct answer: D – Interest cover would reduce to 5 times and the covenant would NOT be breached.

Director A – You can issue bonds without having listed equity, but a “public issue” of bonds still involves heavy regulation and doesn’t remove the need for disclosure. This is not what the question is really getting at → treat as not correct.

Director B – AIM still has regulatory requirements; they are lighter, not non-existent → incorrect.

Director C – Rights issues are for existing shareholders of (normally) listed companies; an unlisted company cannot raise unlimited equity this way → incorrect.

Director D – Listing improves marketability and visibility and generally increases the ability to raise both equity and debt → correct.

Director E – Listed status makes shares more easily tradable and the company more visible, so it becomes a more likely takeover target → correct.

Answer: D and E.

Vertical integration means moving up or down the value chain (suppliers or distributors), not acquiring similar producers (horizontal integration) or unrelated accessory businesses. Buying a listed international logistics firm brings distribution in-house and so is the clearest example of vertical integration that could improve margins.

In CIMA F3, the valuation of a target in an acquisition using P/E multiples is based on the principle that the maximum price a bidder should pay is the value of the target to the bidder, i.e. the value of the target’s earnings when capitalised at the bidder’s P/E ratio if post-acquisition performance is expected to match the bidder’s. When tax is involved, the profits used must be after tax earnings, because the P/E ratio is defined as:

P/E=Market Value of EquityEarnings after tax\text{P/E} = \frac{\text{Market Value of Equity}}{\text{Earnings after tax}}P/E=Earnings after taxMarket Value of Equity​

Step 1 – Convert pre-tax profit to earnings

Company F’s pre-tax profit = $300m.

Corporate tax rate = 30%.

EarningsF=300×(1−0.30)=300×0.70=$210m\text{Earnings}_F = 300 \times (1 - 0.30) = 300 \times 0.70 = \$210\text{m}EarningsF​=300×(1−0.30)=300×0.70=$210m

Step 2 – Apply Company E’s P/E ratio (bootstrapping effect)

Because both firms have similar risk and E believes it can “bootstrap” F’s earnings so that the market values F on E’s P/E of 15:

Value of F to E=EarningsF×P/EE=210×15=$3,150m\text{Value of F to E} = \text{Earnings}_F \times \text{P/E}_E = 210 \times 15 = \$3,150\text{m}Value of F to E=EarningsF​×P/EE​=210×15=$3,150m

This represents the combined value of F’s earnings once integrated into E and re-rated at the higher multiple. Under F3 principles, this figure is the maximum price E should be willing to pay; paying more would destroy value for E’s shareholders because the purchase price would exceed the value created by the acquisition.

Therefore, the maximum offer price to F’s shareholders is:

$3,150 million\boxed{\$3,150\ \text{million}}$3,150 million​