CompTIA Updated SY0-701 Exam Questions and Answers by naya

Threat hunting is the process of proactively searching for signs of malicious activity or compromise in a network, rather than waiting for alerts or indicators of compromise (IOCs) to appear. Threat hunting can help identify new tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by malicious actors, as well as uncover hidden or stealthy threats that may have evaded detection by security tools. Threat hunting requires a combination of skills, tools, and methodologies, such as hypothesis generation, data collection and analysis, threat intelligence, and incident response. Threat hunting can also help improve the security posture of an organization by providing feedback and recommendations for security improvements. References = CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1: Given a scenario, analyze potential indicators of malicious activity. CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-701), Chapter 4: Threat Detection and Response, page 153. Threat Hunting – SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ : 4.1, Video 3:18. CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam SY0-701 Practice Test 1, Question 3.

The next step should be to rescan the network. In vulnerability management, remediation is not complete simply because the operations team says fixes were applied. The security team must validate that the vulnerabilities are actually resolved. A rescan confirms whether patches, configuration changes, service removals, or compensating controls eliminated the previously identified weaknesses. Conducting an audit is broader and not the immediate technical validation step. Starting a penetration test may be useful later, but it is unnecessary before confirming that the known vulnerabilities were fixed. Submitting a report before validation could produce inaccurate closure information. Security+ expects vulnerability management to follow a cycle: identify, analyze, remediate, validate, and report. Validation is done through rescanning.

================

After listing authorized email servers in DNS using SPF, the next protocol the company should apply is DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail). DKIM provides cryptographic assurance that email messages have not been altered in transit and that they were legitimately sent by the domain owner. Security+ SY0-701 explains that DKIM works by digitally signing outgoing emails using a private key, which recipient servers verify using a public key stored in DNS.

SPF validates where an email is sent from, but it does not protect message integrity. DKIM complements SPF by ensuring the message content is authentic, which significantly improves email reputation and reduces spam filtering issues.

DMARC (A) builds on SPF and DKIM but requires both to be in place first. DLP (B) prevents data leakage and is unrelated to email reputation. SPF (D) was already applied, as stated in the question.

Thus, the correct next step is C: DKIM.

A false negative occurs when a security control or scanning tool fails to detect a vulnerability that actually exists. In vulnerability scanning, this means the scan reports a system as secure even though it is vulnerable. Therefore, a result that shows no known vulnerability is an example of a false negative if a vulnerability is present but undetected.

CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 explains that false negatives are particularly dangerous because they provide a false sense of security, potentially leaving systems exposed to exploitation. Causes of false negatives include outdated vulnerability signatures, misconfigured scanners, credentialed scan failures, or unsupported legacy systems.

Option A describes a false positive, where a vulnerability is reported but does not exist. Option B may indicate an outdated scan result, not necessarily a false negative. Option D is incorrect because zero-day vulnerabilities do not have known remediations and are typically not detected by signature-based scanners.

Thus, the correct example of a false negative is C: A result that shows no known vulnerability.