CIPS Updated L4M5 Exam Questions and Answers by kayla

In difficult negotiations and disputes, hardball tactics like punishment and threats often seem like the only way to win concessions. Some negotiators seem to believe that hardball tactics are the key to success in any negotiation. They resort to extreme demands and even unethical behaviour to try to get the upper hand in a negotiation.

The following are 8 typical hardball tactics:

1. Good cop / Bad cop

2. Low ball / High ball

3. Bogey

4. The Nibble

5. Chicken

6. Intimidation

7. Aggressive Behaviour

8. Snow Job

You can read the details of each tactic here.

In the contrary to hardball tactics, negotiators can adopt integrative approach to the negotiation. Some of integrative tactics are:

1. Expand the Pie

2. Bridging

3. Post Settlement –Settlement

Et cetera

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Commercial situations often demand a distributive bargaining approach, if the 'pie' is inherently of a fixed size. In this case, any conflicts must be resolved by sharing it.

In win-lose approach, a negotiator wants to maximise the value obtained in a single deal, the relationship with the other party is not important. Therefore, a strong party may win more than 50% of the metaphorical 'pie'.

It should not be assumed that win-win can be applied to all commercial negotiations, or that win-lose approaches are inherently inferior.

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.