Salesforce Updated Platform-App-Builder Exam Questions and Answers by zaynab

The correct answer is B. Flow.

The requirement is to show the number of open Cases for both the Account and the Parent Account. This is not a simple native roll-up summary scenario because standard roll-up summary fields are mainly for master-detail relationships, while lookup relationships do not support standard roll-up summary fields.

Salesforce specifically documents Flow examples where a flow looks up the parent account, checks how many open cases it has, and evaluates that count. Salesforce also has guidance for creating roll-up-style summaries using Flow, including a use case to count Cases related to an Account.

Why others are incorrect:

A. Approval Process is for approvals, not counting open Cases.

C. Custom object is unnecessary.

D. Roll-up summary is not the best fit for counting Cases across Account and Parent Account relationships.

===========

Feed Tracking is the correct feature because Salesforce can automatically generate feed updates when a tracked field changes on a record. Salesforce Help explains that feed tracking detects changes to tracked record fields and posts updates to the feed. It can also be configured for custom objects.

For this scenario, the app builder would track the travel request approval/status field. When the request becomes Approved, Salesforce posts that tracked change automatically on the record feed.

Why others are incorrect:

Auto-response rule sends automatic email responses, mainly for Lead/Case scenarios.

Approval process manages record approval routing, but the feature that creates automatic feed posts for field changes is Feed Tracking.

Feed quick action is manual, not automatic.

===========

The correct answer is A. Sharing Hierarchy.

Sales reps want to see who has access to an Account record and why/how they have that access. Salesforce provides this through Sharing Hierarchy. Salesforce documentation states that users can click Sharing Hierarchy from the record action menu to display users who have access to the record. Salesforce release documentation also explains that selecting Sharing Hierarchy lets users view record access and the reason for that access.

C. Sharing is not the best answer because the Sharing button is mainly used to manually grant access, not to view the full access hierarchy and access reasons. B. New Task and D. Edit do not relate to record access visibility.

===========

The correct answers are A. Data loss may occur when changing custom field types and D. Field History Tracking records value changes of 255 characters or less.

A is correct because Salesforce warns that changing the data type of an existing custom field can cause data loss in certain situations. This is a key consideration before converting Text Area (Long) fields to Rich Text Area fields.

D is correct because Salesforce field history tracking has a character limitation. Salesforce tracks changes to fields with more than 255 characters as edited, but it does not record the old and new values. That means long/rich text changes beyond that limit do not provide full before-and-after history values.

Why others are incorrect:

B is not the relevant consideration for this field conversion requirement.

C is incorrect because Salesforce reports do not display rich text field values of all lengths fully; Salesforce documentation notes report display limits for long text and rich text area fields.

===========