IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by sheikh

The described situation is a classic social engineering attack, specifically a phishing or CEO fraud (business email compromise) attempt. Social engineering exploits human psychology rather than technical vulnerabilities. In this case, the attacker attempted to impersonate the CEO and trick the board member into making an unauthorized payment.

(A) Incorrect – A risk of spyware and malware.

Spyware and malware typically involve malicious software installed on a device, which is not the case here.

This attack relied on deception rather than malware to obtain unauthorized funds.

(B) Incorrect – A risk of corporate espionage.

Corporate espionage involves unauthorized data theft, sabotage, or insider threats.

The attacker here attempted financial fraud, not intellectual property theft.

(C) Incorrect – A ransomware attack risk.

Ransomware encrypts files and demands payment for decryption.

There is no mention of system encryption or ransom demands in this case.

(D) Correct – A social engineering risk.

The attacker impersonated the CEO and used urgency to manipulate the board member into processing a fraudulent payment.

This technique is a business email compromise (BEC) scam, a well-known social engineering tactic.

IIA’s GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) – Cybersecurity Risks and Controls

Discusses social engineering and its impact on financial fraud.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework – Social Engineering Threats

Defines social engineering tactics, including email impersonation and phishing.

COBIT Framework – Information Security Governance

Recommends controls to mitigate social engineering risks, such as employee training and email authentication mechanisms.

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References and Internal Auditing Standards:

A focus strategy targets a specific market segment, geographical area, or niche customer base rather than competing in the entire market.

Why Option D (Focus strategy) is Correct:

The car manufacturer introduced a hybrid vehicle specifically for the European market to address increasing emission taxes, meaning they are focusing on a specific region and customer need.

Focus strategy aims at tailoring products to meet the needs of a particular group of consumers (e.g., environmentally conscious European customers).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Reactive strategy):

Incorrect because while the company is responding to regulatory changes, "reactive strategy" is not a recognized competitive strategy under Porter’s model.

Option B (Cost leadership strategy):

Incorrect because cost leadership focuses on minimizing costs and offering the lowest price in the broad market. This scenario does not emphasize cost reduction.

Option C (Differentiation strategy):

Incorrect because differentiation involves offering unique products across a broad market, whereas the hybrid vehicle is targeted specifically for the European market.

IIA Practice Guide – "Auditing Strategic Risk Management": Discusses competitive strategies, including focus strategy.

Porter's Competitive Strategy Model: Defines focus strategy as targeting a niche market.

COSO ERM Framework – "Strategic Decision-Making": Recommends market-specific focus strategies to mitigate regulatory risks.

IIA References:

Automated attacks that attempt to exploit weak or leaked passwords—such as credential stuffing, brute force attacks, and dictionary attacks—pose a significant cybersecurity risk. Implementing two-step verification (also known as multi-factor authentication, or MFA) is one of the most effective measures to mitigate these threats.

Why Two-Step Verification is Effective (B - Correct Answer)

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an additional security layer beyond a password, requiring a second factor such as a one-time code sent to a mobile device, biometric authentication, or a security key.

Even if an attacker obtains a password, they cannot access the account without the second authentication factor.

The IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 1: Information Security Management emphasizes the use of multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized access.

Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

Option A: Changing passwords every two years

Ineffective because attackers often use compromised credentials that may be recent. Best practices recommend regular password updates but coupled with MFA.

The IIA's GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management highlights that password rotation alone does not fully protect against automated attacks.

Option C: Using a VPN when out of the office

Irrelevant to password attacks. A VPN encrypts data and secures network connections but does not prevent brute force or credential stuffing attacks.

The IIA GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security discusses VPNs for secure remote access but does not consider them a solution for password-based attacks.

Option D: Using antivirus and security tools

While important for overall security, these tools cannot prevent attacks that exploit stolen or weak passwords.

The IIA GTAG 15: Information Security Governance states that security tools should be combined with authentication controls like MFA for best protection.

GTAG 1: Information Security Management – Recommends multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized system access.

GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management – Highlights the limitations of password-only security and supports multi-factor authentication.

GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security – Covers VPN usage but does not consider it a solution for password attacks.

GTAG 15: Information Security Governance – Discusses the role of security tools and authentication in securing user accounts.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, requiring two-step verification (B) is the most effective control against automated password attacks.

The matching principle is a fundamental accounting concept that ensures that expenses are recorded in the same period as the revenues they help generate.

Why Option C (Expense recognition is tied to revenue recognition) is Correct:

The matching principle states that expenses should be recognized in the same period as the revenue they help generate to ensure accurate financial reporting.

This principle is applied in accrual accounting under GAAP and IFRS, ensuring that expenses and revenues are properly aligned.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Revenues should be recognized when earned):

This describes the revenue recognition principle, not the matching principle.

Option B (Revenue recognition is matched with cash):

Incorrect because the matching principle applies to accrual accounting, not cash accounting. Revenue can be recognized before cash is received.

Option D (Expenses are recognized at each accounting period):

Incorrect because expenses are not necessarily recognized in every period; they are matched to revenue.

IIA Practice Guide – "Auditing Financial Reporting Controls": Discusses the importance of the matching principle.

GAAP & IFRS Accounting Standards: Define and require the application of the matching principle.

COSO Internal Control Framework: Emphasizes revenue-expense alignment for accurate financial reporting.

IIA References: