IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by syeda

Understanding Matrix Organizations:

A matrix organization is a hybrid structure that combines functional and project-based structures, where employees report to multiple managers (e.g., a functional manager and a project manager).

These organizations adapt to projects by adjusting authority, responsibility, and accountability based on the project's stage or the organization's culture.

Why Option C Is Correct?

In a matrix organization, roles and decision-making authority evolve based on the project's phase, size, or complexity.

Employees might report to different managers at different times, and accountability structures may change.

This aligns with IIA Standard 2110 – Governance, which emphasizes clear roles and responsibilities in dynamic organizational structures.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Unity-of-command concept):

The unity-of-command principle states that employees should report to only one superior, which contradicts the nature of a matrix organization, where dual reporting exists.

Option B (Combination of product and functional departments allows management to utilize personnel from various functions):

While matrix organizations integrate product and functional departments, the key defining feature is the variable authority, responsibility, and accountability, making option C a better fit.

Option D (Best suited for firms with scattered locations or large-scale firms):

While matrix structures can be used in large firms, they are not limited to them and are often found in project-based industries (e.g., engineering, IT, consulting).

Matrix organizations adapt their authority structures based on project needs, making option C the best choice.

IIA Standard 2110 supports governance structures that evolve with organizational needs.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Organizational Structure & Accountability)

COSO ERM – Governance & Decision-Making in Matrix Organizations

Understanding Labor Variances in Cost Accounting:

Labor efficiency variance measures the difference between the actual hours worked and the standard hours allowed for actual production.

Labor rate variance measures the difference between the actual labor cost per hour and the standard rate set for labor.

Why Options 1 (Favorable Labor Efficiency Variance) and 2 (Adverse Labor Rate Variance) Are Correct?

Favorable Labor Efficiency Variance (1):

Hiring more experienced researchers should lead to higher productivity, meaning that the team completes tasks faster, reducing the total labor hours required.

This results in a favorable labor efficiency variance because less time is spent on the project than initially expected.

Adverse Labor Rate Variance (2):

More experienced employees command higher salaries, leading to an increase in labor costs per hour compared to the budgeted rate.

This results in an adverse labor rate variance because the actual wage rate exceeds the standard rate.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option 3 (Adverse Labor Efficiency Variance):

This would occur if the new hires were less productive, which contradicts the scenario.

Option 4 (Favorable Labor Rate Variance):

A favorable variance in labor rate occurs when labor costs are lower than expected, which is unlikely when hiring more experienced (higher-paid) employees.

Hiring more experienced employees improves efficiency (favorable efficiency variance) but increases wages (adverse rate variance).

IIA Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care requires auditors to consider operational efficiency in decision-making evaluations.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care

IIA Practice Guide – Assessing Business Performance Metrics

A disaster recovery plan (DRP) ensures that an organization can restore operations after a major IT system failure. The level of readiness depends on the type of recovery site used:

Correct Answer (A - A Warm Recovery Plan)

A warm site is a partially configured recovery site with some hardware and network infrastructure in place.

In the event of a disaster, some configuration and data restoration are required before full operation can resume.

This solution balances cost and recovery speed, making it ideal for moderate-risk scenarios.

The IIA GTAG 10: Business Continuity Management discusses warm sites as an effective disaster recovery solution.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option B (A Cold Recovery Plan):

A cold site has minimal infrastructure and requires significant time for setup and data restoration.

This is not ideal for organizations needing faster recovery.

Option C (A Hot Recovery Plan):

A hot site is a fully operational backup system that allows instant recovery, but it is very costly.

The scenario mentions "some configuration and data restoration", which suggests a warm site, not a hot site.

Option D (A Manual Work Processes Plan):

A manual plan involves non-IT solutions, which would not address IT system restoration.

IIA GTAG 10: Business Continuity Management – Describes warm, cold, and hot sites for disaster recovery.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Business Continuity Plans – Recommends warm recovery sites for balancing cost and recovery time.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, A is the correct answer because a warm recovery plan allows partial system readiness with minimal downtime.

Understanding the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC):

The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) measures the time taken for a company to convert raw materials into cash flow.

CCC is calculated using the formula: CCC=DaysInventoryOutstanding(DIO)+DaysSalesOutstanding(DSO)−DaysPayableOutstanding(DPO)CCC = Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) + Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) - Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)CCC=DaysInventoryOutstanding(DIO)+DaysSalesOutstanding(DSO)−DaysPayableOutstanding(DPO)

Where:

DIO (Days Inventory Outstanding) = 55 days (time to convert raw materials to finished products).

DSO (Days Sales Outstanding) = 42 days (time to collect receivables).

DPO (Days Payable Outstanding) = 10 days (time to pay for raw materials).

Applying the Formula:

CCC=55+42−10CCC = 55 + 42 - 10CCC=55+42−10 CCC=100 daysCCC = 100 \text{ days}CCC=100 days

Why Option C (100 Days) Is Correct?

The CCC represents the time the company’s cash is tied up in production and sales before receiving payment.

This calculation aligns with IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management, which requires auditors to assess financial liquidity and operational efficiency.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (26 days): Incorrect calculation.

Option B (90 days): Does not subtract DPO correctly.

Option D (110 days): Incorrect addition of all components instead of following the CCC formula.

The correct cash conversion cycle is 100 days, calculated using standard CCC methodology.

IIA Standard 2120 and financial management principles confirm the correct calculation.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Financial Performance & Liquidity Risk)

COSO ERM – Working Capital & Cash Flow Management

Financial Management Best Practices – Cash Conversion Cycle Analysis