IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by fionn

A systems development methodology refers to a structured approach used in software development and systems engineering to guide the design, development, and implementation of software applications.

Why Option A (Waterfall) is Correct:

Waterfall methodology is a linear and sequential systems development methodology where each phase (e.g., requirements, design, implementation, testing, deployment) must be completed before moving to the next.

It is widely established and historically one of the first software development methodologies.

Used in large-scale enterprise projects where detailed planning and structured execution are required.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option B (PRINCE2 - Projects in Controlled Environments):

Incorrect because PRINCE2 is a project management framework, not a systems development methodology.

Option C (ITIL - Information Technology Infrastructure Library):

Incorrect because ITIL is a set of IT service management (ITSM) best practices, not a software development methodology.

Option D (COBIT - Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies):

Incorrect because COBIT is a governance framework for IT management and controls, not a development methodology.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing IT Projects and Systems Development": Highlights Waterfall as a traditional systems development methodology.

IIA’s Global Technology Audit Guide on IT Risks: Discusses software development lifecycle risks, including Waterfall methodology.

COBIT Framework – BAI03 (Manage Solutions Identification and Build): References structured methodologies like Waterfall in IT governance.

IIA References:

A capital lease (now referred to as a finance lease under IFRS 16 and ASC 842) is a leasing arrangement where an organization records the leased asset and liability on its balance sheet as if it were owned. Organizations enter into capital leases to improve financial metrics, including free cash flow from operations.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: To increase the ability to borrow additional funds from creditors

Incorrect. A capital lease creates a liability on the balance sheet, which may reduce borrowing capacity rather than increase it.

Option B: To reduce the organization's free cash flow from operations

Incorrect.

Operating leases impact operating cash flow because lease payments are treated as operating expenses.

Capital leases (finance leases) shift payments to financing activities, improving operating cash flow since lease obligations are classified as debt.

Option C: To improve the organization's free cash flow from operations

Correct.

Capital lease payments are classified under financing activities rather than operating activities, which increases free cash flow from operations.

This improves financial ratios and liquidity metrics, making the organization appear more attractive to investors.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess lease accounting and financial reporting impacts under IFRS 16 (Leases) and ASC 842 (Leases). (IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Reporting Risks)

Option D: To acquire the asset at the end of the lease period at a price lower than the fair market value

Incorrect. While some capital leases include a bargain purchase option, the primary reason for entering into a capital lease is financial reporting benefits, not necessarily acquiring the asset.

Thus, the verified answer is C. To improve the organization's free cash flow from operations.

An assurance map provides an overview of assurance activities across the organization and helps identify gaps (uncovered risks) and duplications (overlap of work). This enhances coordination among assurance providers and supports the board’s governance oversight.

Option B is incorrect because the board does not coordinate activities; internal audit facilitates assurance mapping. Option C misinterprets the tool—it does not assign specific audits. Option D refers to staff competencies, not assurance coverage.

The internal audit plan must remain dynamic and responsive to changes in circumstances. If a key project is postponed, the CAE should amend the audit plan, reallocate resources appropriately, and inform the board and senior management for review and approval. This ensures transparency and continued alignment with organizational risks.

Option A improperly shifts audit resources under management’s direction. Option B may be considered but requires board and management approval through an amended plan. Option D leaves resources idle, which is inefficient.