IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by keanu

When calculating available audit hours, the CAE must exclude non-engagement activities such as administration, meetings, professional development, and staff coaching. These are essential but not directly part of engagement execution.

Preliminary risk assessment (Option B), documentation (Option C), and reporting (Option D) are all integral steps of an engagement and should be included in engagement hours. Thus, only coaching time (Option A) should be deducted.

When an organization faces unexpected disruptions, such as the inability to receive raw materials due to a military conflict, it should have contingency plans in place to manage such risks.

Contingency Planning for Unforeseen Events (Correct Answer: C)

Contingency plans are designed to prepare for and respond to unexpected disruptions, such as supply chain failures, political instability, or natural disasters.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management requires organizations to have business continuity and disaster recovery plans, which include contingencies for supply chain disruptions.

A well-prepared contingency plan could involve alternative suppliers, stockpiling critical materials, or adjusting production schedules.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Just-in-time (JIT) delivery plans (Incorrect)

JIT is a supply chain management strategy that minimizes inventory and relies on timely delivery.

While JIT increases efficiency, it is not a backup plan for unexpected disruptions.

In fact, JIT makes companies more vulnerable to supply chain interruptions.

B. Backup plans (Incorrect)

A backup plan generally refers to IT/data backup or system recovery strategies, not a comprehensive risk management approach for supply chain issues.

Contingency plans encompass broader business continuity strategies beyond simple backup plans.

D. Standing plans (Incorrect)

Standing plans are routine, long-term procedures for normal operations, such as HR policies or standard operating procedures.

They do not specifically address unexpected crises like supply chain failures due to war.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Ensuring business continuity planning)

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance (Assessing organizational resilience strategies)

IIA Standard 2130 – Compliance (Evaluating regulatory and risk mitigation plans)

Step-by-Step Justification:IIA References for This Answer:Thus, the correct answer is C. Contingency plans, as they are specifically designed to address unexpected disruptions like supply chain failures due to military conflict.

Centralized authority refers to decision-making being concentrated at the top levels of an organization, ensuring uniform policies and procedures across departments.

Let's analyze each option:

A. Fraud committed through collusion is more likely when authority is centralized.

Incorrect. Centralized authority reduces the chances of fraud by enforcing strict oversight and controls. Decentralized structures may create more opportunities for fraud due to inconsistent policies.

B. Centralized managerial authority typically enhances certainty and consistency within an organization. ✅ (Correct Answer)

Correct. Centralized authority ensures consistent decision-making, standardized processes, and clear policies, reducing uncertainty.

For example, in a multinational company, a centralized governance structure ensures compliance with financial reporting standards across all subsidiaries.

C. When authority is centralized, the alignment of activities to achieve business goals typically is decreased.

Incorrect. Centralized authority actually helps in aligning business activities toward strategic goals by ensuring uniform direction and coordination.

D. Using separation of duties to mitigate collusion is reduced only when authority is centralized.

Incorrect. Separation of duties (SoD) is a key internal control mechanism that exists regardless of centralization. Organizations implement SoD through policies, not just governance structures.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance – Emphasizes the importance of clear governance structures in organizations.

COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework – Discusses centralization and its impact on risk management and control effectiveness.

IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) – Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) – Highlights the role of centralized authority in aligning corporate strategies.

ISO 37000:2021 – Governance of Organizations – Outlines how centralized governance improves organizational consistency and decision-making.

IIA References:

When a company finances through bonds (debt) instead of issuing common stock (equity), it increases earnings per share (EPS) because bond financing does not dilute ownership, whereas issuing new stock does.

Impact on Earnings Per Share (EPS):

EPS formula: EPS=Net Income−Preferred DividendsNumber of Outstanding Shares\text{EPS} = \frac{\text{Net Income} - \text{Preferred Dividends}}{\text{Number of Outstanding Shares}}EPS=Number of Outstanding SharesNet Income−Preferred Dividends​

Since bond financing does not increase the number of shares outstanding, net income is distributed among fewer shareholders, increasing EPS.

If the company issues more stock instead of bonds, EPS decreases because the same earnings are divided among more shares.

Why Bond Financing Affects EPS Favorably:

Interest on bonds is tax-deductible, reducing taxable income and increasing net profits.

Unlike dividends, which are paid on common stock and reduce retained earnings, bondholders receive fixed interest payments that do not dilute equity ownership.

A. Lower shareholder control: ❌

Bondholders do not get voting rights, whereas issuing more stock reduces existing shareholders’ control.

This statement would be true for stock financing, not bond financing.

B. Lower indebtedness: ❌

Bonds increase a company’s debt obligations, not reduce them.

If a company uses stock financing instead of bonds, it avoids taking on debt.

D. Higher overall company earnings: ❌

While bonds increase EPS, they do not necessarily increase total earnings.

The company must pay interest on bonds, which could reduce net income if not managed properly.

IIA Standard 2110 (Governance): Ensures management selects financing strategies that align with financial stability.

COSO ERM Framework – Financial Risk Management: Evaluates how financing choices impact shareholder value and risk exposure.

IFRS & GAAP Accounting Standards on Debt vs. Equity Financing: Explain how bond financing increases EPS compared to issuing new shares.

Step-by-Step Justification:Why Not the Other Options?IIA References: