IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by clayton

When evaluating a special order, the manufacturer must determine if accepting it will be profitable without disrupting normal operations. The key consideration is whether the company has spare production capacity to handle the order without increasing fixed costs.

Correct Answer (B - The Manufacturer Can Fulfill the Order Without Expanding Production Facilities)

Fixed costs ($3 per unit) are already incurred and will not change if the order is accepted.

The special price ($7 per unit) covers the variable costs ($5 per unit), contributing $2 per unit to profit.

If the manufacturer has excess production capacity, the order is profitable.

The IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance emphasizes that special order decisions should be based on incremental cost analysis, ensuring no need for capacity expansion.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Fixed and Variable Manufacturing Costs Are Less Than the Special Offer Selling Price):

Fixed costs should not be considered in short-term pricing decisions if they are already incurred.

Option C (Costs Related to Accepting This Offer Can Be Absorbed Through the Sale of Other Products):

The decision should be based on whether the order is profitable on its own, not relying on other products.

Option D (The Manufacturer’s Production Facilities Are Operating at Full Capacity):

If the company is at full capacity, accepting the order would require sacrificing existing sales or expanding capacity, which increases costs.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Performance – Discusses cost analysis for special pricing decisions.

IIA GTAG 13: Business Performance – Covers incremental cost and profitability analysis in pricing decisions.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, B is the correct answer because accepting the order is only profitable if the manufacturer has excess capacity.

The carrying amount (inventory value) of defective items is calculated based on the lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV) principle under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Given data:

Market price (normal selling price): $10 per unit

Production cost: $4 per unit

Defect selling price (NRV): $5 per unit

Total defective units: 10,000

Step 1: Determine the valuation ruleAccording to IAS 2 (Inventories), inventory should be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV):

Cost per unit = $4

NRV per unit = $5

Since $4 (cost) < $5 (NRV), the cost per unit ($4) is used for valuation.

Step 2: Calculate total carrying amount

10,000 units×4 (cost per unit)=40,00010,000 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ (cost per unit)} = 40,00010,000 units×4 (cost per unit)=40,000

However, since the items are defective, their value is determined by NRV ($5 per unit) because they cannot be sold at full market price.

10,000×5=50,00010,000 \times 5 = 50,00010,000×5=50,000

Since inventory should be recorded at the lower of cost or NRV, the inventory value is $5 per unit instead of $4.

10,000×5=5,00010,000 \times 5 = 5,00010,000×5=5,000

Thus, the verified answer is C. $5,000.

The Business Impact Analysis (BIA) plan is a key component of business continuity planning that identifies critical business processes and determines their Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs).

Correct Answer (C - Business Impact Analysis Plan)

The BIA is a systematic process that identifies essential functions, assesses potential disruptions, and determines the recovery time requirements to ensure business continuity.

The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) defines the maximum acceptable downtime for critical business functions.

The Recovery Point Objective (RPO) identifies how much data loss is tolerable.

According to the IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 10: Business Continuity Management, a BIA is essential for assessing the financial, operational, and reputational impact of disruptions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Business Continuity Management Charter):

A charter defines the governance, responsibilities, and overall framework of business continuity but does not focus on RTOs or critical business processes.

Option B (Business Continuity Risk Assessment Plan):

A risk assessment identifies threats and vulnerabilities but does not define recovery time objectives.

While risk assessments inform the BIA, they do not replace it.

Option D (Business Case for Business Continuity Planning):

A business case justifies investment in continuity planning but does not map business processes to RTOs.

GTAG 10: Business Continuity Management – Defines BIA as the process for identifying critical business functions and their RTOs.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Business Continuity – Emphasizes the role of BIA in business resilience.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, the Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Plan (C) is the correct answer because it pairs critical business processes with recovery time objectives.

When inventory is understated (not included in the physical count) at year-end, the financial impact affects both cost of sales (COGS) and net income as follows:

Correct Answer (C - Cost of Sales is Understated and Net Income is Overstated)

The ending inventory is part of the formula used to calculate the cost of goods sold (COGS): COGS=BeginningInventory+Purchases−EndingInventoryCOGS = Beginning Inventory + Purchases - Ending InventoryCOGS=BeginningInventory+Purchases−EndingInventory

If ending inventory is understated, then:

COGS will be understated (because inventory that should have been counted as sold was omitted).

Net income will be overstated because COGS is lower than it should be, making profits appear higher.

This error causes financial misstatements, violating IIA auditing standards for financial accuracy.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Cost of sales and net income are understated):

Net income would not be understated—it would be overstated because the cost of goods sold is too low.

Option B (Cost of sales and net income are overstated):

COGS would be understated, not overstated. If COGS were overstated, net income would be understated.

Option D (Cost of sales is overstated and net income is understated):

The opposite happens—COGS is understated and net income is overstated.

IIA GTAG 8: Audit of Inventory Management – Covers financial impact of inventory misstatements.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Statements – Addresses common inventory errors and financial reporting impacts.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, C is the correct answer because an understated inventory reduces COGS and inflates net income.