IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Questions and Answers by tudor

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Allowing external devices to access proprietary systems introduces compliance risks, as these devices may not meet the organization’s security, data protection, and regulatory standards.

Option B (Privacy) – Important but does not fully capture the risk of unauthorized access or non-compliance with security protocols.

Option C (Strategic) – Strategic risks relate to business direction, not security concerns with third-party access.

Option D (Physical security) – Physical risks involve device theft, which is secondary to compliance when granting access.

Since compliance violations can lead to regulatory penalties and data breaches, Option A (Compliance) is the correct answer.

The Global Internal Audit Standards require unrestricted access to records, personnel, and information. If access is restricted in such a way that audit results are compromised, the CAE cannot claim conformance with the Standards in any report until the issue is resolved.

Options A, B, and C are all in alignment with the Standards and do not affect conformance. Only restriction of access (Option D) requires immediate discontinuation of conformance claims.

Overseas production usually has the highest market-entry cost because it may require investment in foreign facilities, equipment, employees, supply chains, local compliance, management infrastructure, tax planning, and operational controls. It also exposes the organization to political, currency, labor, environmental, and regulatory risks. Exporting is generally less costly because products are produced domestically and sold abroad. Licensing usually requires lower investment because the licensee performs production or distribution in exchange for fees or royalties. Joint ventures may involve shared costs and risks with a local partner, making them less costly than wholly owned overseas production in many cases. Internal audit should evaluate whether management’s expansion method is consistent with risk appetite, available resources, and control capability. Therefore, Option D is correct.

The most effective way to mitigate the risk of poor-quality spare parts is through independent verification of deliveries, such as inspections and testing. This detects defects before acceptance and payment, reducing the likelihood of defective parts entering operations.

Option A adds approval steps but does not address product quality. Option B relies on vendor statements, which may be unreliable. Option D strengthens contract language but does not ensure compliance at delivery.