FINRA Updated SIE Exam Questions and Answers by neave

Churning is the prohibited practice of excessive trading in a customer’s account—often a discretionary account—primarily to generate commissions or other compensation for the broker rather than to meet the customer’s investment objectives. That makes B correct. The core elements regulators look for are: control over the account (discretion or de facto control), excessive frequency/volume relative to the customer’s profile, and an intent or effect of generating commissions at the customer’s expense. Churning violates ethical standards and anti-fraud principles because it places the broker’s interest ahead of the customer’s.

Choice A, kiting, typically refers to exploiting the time it takes for checks to clear by writing checks against insufficient funds—this is a banking/payment fraud concept, not excessive trading. Choice C, freeriding, refers to buying securities in a cash account and then selling them before paying for them, using sale proceeds to cover the purchase—this is linked to cash account payment violations and Regulation T concepts, not overtrading. Choice D, front running, involves trading ahead of a customer order or block trade (or ahead of research) to profit from an expected price move—again, not the same as excessive trading to generate commissions.

The SIE emphasizes prohibited practices in customer accounts, including excessive trading, conflicts of interest, and supervisory obligations. Recognizing churning is essential because it is a classic example of misconduct where the customer’s best interest is subordinated to compensation incentives.

FINRA rules restrict allocations of shares in certain equity IPOs to prevent improper practices and conflicts of interest, especially involving industry insiders and “restricted persons.” However, institutional customers are generally permitted to purchase IPO shares, subject to the firm’s allocation policies and applicable restrictions. Therefore, the best answer is B.

Choice A is problematic because a bank portfolio manager purchasing “for their own account” may fall into restricted categories depending on role and affiliations; the phrasing suggests a financial industry professional acting personally, which raises restricted person concerns. Choice C is also generally restricted: persons associated with a broker-dealer (even in a non-registered role) may be considered restricted persons for IPO allocations, depending on the specifics, because the rule is designed to keep IPO shares from being funneled to industry insiders who could benefit improperly. Choice D is similarly suspicious because registered representatives at any broker-dealer may be restricted from buying IPO shares for their own accounts even if their firm is not involved in the offering; the restriction focuses on associated persons and conflicts, not just participation in the specific deal.

On the SIE, the tested concept is that IPO allocations are subject to rules designed to protect fairness and prevent “spinning” or insider favoritism. Institutional customers are generally not the prohibited category in this set of options, making them the clean permitted choice.

The correct answer is C, A tender offer. A tender offer is considered a voluntary corporate action because it gives shareholders the choice to participate or not. In a tender offer, a company or third party offers to purchase shares from existing shareholders at a specified price, usually at a premium to market value. Investors can decide whether to tender (sell) their shares.

Step-by-step, voluntary corporate actions require active participation or decision-making by the investor. If the investor does nothing, no action is taken on their behalf.

Choice A, a stock split, is a mandatory corporate action—all shareholders are automatically affected, and no decision is required. Choice B, a full merger, is also mandatory once approved, as shareholders are typically required to exchange their shares for new securities or cash. Choice D, pre-refunding, is related to municipal bonds and is not a voluntary action for investors; it involves the issuer setting aside funds to retire debt early.

Thus, the only option where the investor has control and discretion to participate is a tender offer, making Answer C correct.

A call option is considered covered when the seller (writer) owns the underlying security in sufficient quantity to meet the delivery obligation if the option is exercised. In listed equity options, one options contract typically represents 100 shares of the underlying stock. Here, the investor owns 200 shares of ABC stock. That means the investor can cover two call contracts (2 × 100 shares = 200 shares). Since the investor sold four calls, only two of them are covered; the remaining two calls are uncovered (naked). Therefore, the correct answer is C.

This question tests a fundamental options concept that is heavily emphasized on the SIE: understanding contract size, delivery obligations, and the risk difference between covered and uncovered strategies. If the covered calls are assigned, the investor can deliver the shares they already own, limiting the risk profile on those contracts. For the uncovered calls, if assigned, the investor would need to purchase shares in the market to deliver (or otherwise acquire them), which exposes the investor to potentially unlimited loss if the stock rises substantially above the strike price.

The mechanics are straightforward:

Shares owned: 200

Shares required per call contract: 100

Covered contracts = 200 ÷ 100 = 2

This is also a subtle suitability/risk topic: selling uncovered calls is generally far riskier than selling covered calls, and firms often require higher options approval levels for uncovered writing. Understanding what makes an option “covered” is essential for evaluating both strategy intent and risk exposure.