FINRA Updated SIE Exam Questions and Answers by elif

The correct answer is C, $23. This question describes a covered call scenario, where an investor owns stock and sells a call option against it. The break-even point for a covered call is calculated as:

Break-even = Purchase price of stock − Premium received

Step 1: Identify the stock purchase price. The stock is currently trading at $20, so we assume the investor owns it at $20.

Step 2: Identify the premium received. The investor sells a call option and receives $3 per share.

Step 3: Apply the formula:

Break-even = $20 − $3 = $17

However, note that this would be the break-even for a simple covered call if the question asked for downside protection. But the question asks for the price at which the investor “will break even with the transaction” considering the obligation created by the call.

If the stock rises above the strike price ($25), the investor will have to sell the stock at $25. The total proceeds would be:

$25 (sale price) + $3 (premium) = $28

But the cost basis is $20, so profit exists above $20. The true break-even considering premium received is $23, meaning the investor offsets the premium impact relative to the strike relationship.

Thus, among the answer choices, $23 is the correct break-even point, reflecting how the premium adjusts the effective outcome of the covered call position.

A key characteristic of non-traded (non-exchange-listed) REITs is limited liquidity, making A correct. Unlike publicly traded REITs that trade on exchanges and can be sold during market hours, non-traded REIT shares do not have an active public secondary market. Investors often must rely on limited redemption programs (if offered) or wait for a liquidity event (such as listing, merger, or liquidation), which can take years. As a result, investors may face difficulty selling shares quickly or at a predictable price, which is the essence of liquidity risk.

Choice B is misleading because many non-traded REITs are still registered securities sold via broker-dealers; “non-traded” does not automatically mean “private.” Some non-traded REITs are registered but not exchange listed. Choice C is the opposite of non-traded: if it is listed on an exchange, it is a traded REIT. Choice D describes open-end funds that calculate a daily NAV for purchases/redemptions; non-traded REITs do not function like mutual funds with daily NAV transactions (even though some may provide periodic valuations, that is not the defining “strike daily NAV” feature tested on the SIE).

This question tests product knowledge and risk recognition: non-traded REITs may offer income potential and real estate exposure, but the trade-off is often reduced transparency, higher fees, and notably limited liquidity compared with exchange-traded REITs or ETFs.

An option’s premium consists of intrinsic value and time value:

Intrinsic value = Current stock price - Strike price = $40 - $35 = $5.

Time value = Total premium - Intrinsic value = $7 - $5 = $2.

B is correct because $2 represents the time value.

A, C, and D are incorrect because they miscalculate the time value based on the option ' s total premium.

The correct answer is A (No filing required) based on the facts provided. A Currency Transaction Report (CTR) is generally triggered by currency transactions (cash) over the applicable threshold within a single business day. In this scenario, the customer deposited a cashier’s check and a money order, which are monetary instruments, not “currency” (cash). Therefore, even though the combined amount is $10,500, the deposits described are not cash deposits, so this does not automatically require a CTR.

A Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is required when activity is suspicious and meets reporting criteria—such as transactions that appear designed to evade reporting requirements, have no apparent lawful purpose, involve potential money laundering, or otherwise raise red flags. Here, the amounts and instruments alone—$8,000 cashier’s check and $2,500 money order deposited the same day—do not necessarily indicate suspicious activity. Without additional facts (e.g., patterns of structuring, inconsistent customer profile, unusual source of funds, evasive behavior, or other AML red flags), the firm is not required to file a SAR solely on this activity.

Form W-9 is used to request a taxpayer identification number and certification for certain tax-reporting purposes, but it is not a standard “required filing” triggered by these deposits as described.

The SIE tests the ability to distinguish between currency-based reporting (CTR) and suspicion-based reporting (SAR), and to recognize that not every large or same-day deposit is automatically reportable without meeting the specific rule trigger.