PMI Updated PMI-RMP Exam Questions and Answers by ronald

When facing resistance from team members, the risk manager should engage in open communication to address their concerns and clarify the importance of risk management in the project.

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 11: Project Risk Management1, the risk manager should handle this situation by meeting with team members to address their concerns. This is because:

Resistance to risk management is a common challenge that can hinder the effectiveness and efficiency of the risk management process. Resistance can stem from various factors, such as lack of awareness, understanding, commitment, trust, or support for risk management; fear of negative consequences or blame; competing priorities or interests; or cultural differences or biases.

Meeting with team members to address their concerns is a proactive and constructive way to overcome resistance and foster a positive risk culture within the project. By meeting with team members, the risk manager can:

Communicate the value and benefits of risk management for the project and the organization, such as improving decision-making, enhancing performance, increasing stakeholder satisfaction, and reducing uncertainty and variability.

Educate and train team members on the risk management principles, processes, tools, and techniques, and how they can be applied to the project context and objectives.

Involve and empower team members in the risk management activities, such as identifying, analyzing, prioritizing, responding, and monitoring risks, and solicit their feedback and suggestions for improvement.

Recognize and reward team members for their contributions and achievements in risk management, and celebrate the successful outcomes and opportunities realized by the project.

The other options are not effective in handling this situation because:

Continuing to implement the risk strategy without addressing the resistance can lead to further conflict, resentment, and distrust among the team members, and undermine the quality and credibility of the risk management process and outputs.

Reducing the number of risk management activities can compromise the project’s ability to identify and respond to the risks that may affect its scope, schedule, cost, quality, or other objectives, and expose the project to unnecessary threats or missed opportunities.

Raising the concerns with the project sponsor can escalate the issue and create a negative impression of the team members, and may not resolve the underlying causes of the resistance or improve the team’s engagement and commitment to risk management.

The risk manager should recommend that the project manager review the plans for the key activity, as this will help identify potential issues and opportunities to improve the activity's performance and reduce its impact on the critical path.

The risk manager should recommend the project manager to review the plans for the key activity, which is now on the critical path according to the Monte Carlo simul-ation. The critical path is the sequence of activities that determines the minimum possible duration of the project. Any delay on the critical path will affect the project completion date. Therefore, it is important to review the plans for the key activity and identify any potential risks, issues, or opportunities that may affect its performance. The risk manager and the project manager should also evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of any risk response strategies for the key activity, such as fast-tracking, crashing, or resource optimization. The other options are not appropriate recommendations for the risk manager to make. Adding more float to the key activity is not possible, since the critical path has zero float by definition. Adding more contingency to the project may not address the specific risks or issues related to the key activity. Increasing the budget for the key activity may not improve its duration or quality, and may also increase the project cost baseline unnecessarily. References: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Examination Content Outline and Specifications, page 91. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, pages 215-2162. Project Critical Path Analysis Using Monte Carlo simul-ation3.

Quantitative risk analysis helps to numerically analyze the probability and impact of risks on project objectives. By performing quantitative risk analysis, the risk manager can present the risks with the most impact on achieving the project objectives to the project sponsor. (Reference: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, p. 423)

According to the PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP) Reference Materials, sensitivity analysis is a type of probabilistic analysis that determines how sensitive the results of the analysis are to uncertainties in input variables. Sensitivity analysis determines which uncertainty has the greatest potential for an impact on the project objectives, such as cost, schedule, scope, or quality1. In this case, the risk manager should use sensitivity analysis to facilitate the sponsor’s ask, as it will help to identify and present the risks that have the most impact on achieving the project objectives. Sensitivity analysis can also show how the project objectives will vary with the changes in the input variables, such as the probability and impact of risks2. Sensitivity analysis can be performed using various tools and techniques, such as tornado diagrams, spider charts, or influence diagrams3.

Since the project manager cannot avoid, transfer, or mitigate the risk, the only remaining option is to accept the risk and develop a contingency plan to handle it if it occurs.

According to the PMI-RMP Exam Content Outline1, one of the tools and techniques for risk response planning is risk response strategies. These are the actions that the project manager and the project team take to address the identified risks, either positive or negative. For negative risks or threats, the PMI-RMP Exam Content Outline1 lists four possible strategies: avoid, transfer, mitigate, and accept.

Avoid risk means changing the project plan to eliminate the threat or its impact2. For example, changing the scope, schedule, or budget to avoid a risk.

Transfer risk means shifting the impact of a threat to a third party, such as a contractor, vendor, or insurer2. For example, buying insurance, outsourcing, or using performance bonds to transfer a risk.

Mitigate risk means reducing the probability and/or impact of a threat2. For example, conducting more tests, adopting best practices, or providing training to mitigate a risk.

Accept risk means acknowledging the existence of a threat and being willing to deal with its consequences2. For example, doing nothing, establishing a contingency reserve, or developing a contingency plan to accept a risk.

In this question, the project manager has determined that they cannot outsource work (transfer) nor eliminate the scope (avoid). They also discover that they cannot buy insurance (transfer) or mitigate the risk. Therefore, the only remaining option is to accept the risk. Accepting the risk does not mean ignoring the risk, but rather recognizing it and preparing for its potential occurrence and impact. Therefore, the best answer is D.