ACFE Updated CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam Questions and Answers by owais

Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:

Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.

Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Element of surprise:A key feature of fraud audits.

C. Fraud assessment questioning:Valid as part of the audit process.

D. Management’s intentions:Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.

Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.

The Fraud Risk Assessment chapter explains that one of the most important concepts in conducting an effective fraud risk assessment is learning to think like a fraudster. The manual states that team members should set aside assumptions that fraud could not occur and instead consider how misconduct might actually be committed and concealed within the organization. This perspective helps identify realistic fraud schemes, opportunities, methods of concealment, and potential override risks. The manual does not say that management’s influence should be minimized in all respects, nor does it require that an outside consultant must always conduct the assessment. Rather, it stresses objectivity, proper team selection, and a willingness to consider fraud risks honestly. Therefore, the most accurate choice is that conducting an effective fraud risk assessment requires thinking like a fraudster.

Under ISA 240, when an auditor identifies or suspects fraud involving management, especially senior management, the auditor must communicate the matter to those charged with governance unless clearly inappropriate. Because Jeffrey is the CEO, reporting directly to him would not be appropriate. The auditor should not immediately report to a government authority unless law, regulation, or professional duty requires external reporting. The auditor also should not remain silent simply because legal liability might exist. Confronting the CEO to obtain a confession is not the auditor’s role and could compromise the audit, investigation, or evidence. Those charged with governance, such as the board or audit committee, are responsible for oversight and should be informed of suspected senior management fraud. Therefore, option B is correct.

The Corporate Governance chapter explains that there is no single universal corporate governance law that applies to all organizations everywhere. Instead, governance requirements arise from a combination of legislation, regulations, listing rules, and governance codes that vary by jurisdiction. The manual also notes that international principles, such as the G20/OECD Principles, are intended to work across different legal and regulatory frameworks, which reinforces that organizations operating in multiple countries may face multiple applicable governance regimes. A publicly traded multinational corporation therefore cannot rely solely on standards adopted by its own board, nor can it ignore governance rules because it operates internationally. The most accurate statement is that Acme must comply with the corporate governance-related legislation that applies in the jurisdictions where it operates.

=============