CompTIA Updated N10-009 Exam Questions and Answers by taran

WPA2/WPA3 mixed mode provides compatibility for older devices (that only support WPA2) while allowing newer devices to take advantage of stronger WPA3 encryption. This ensures maximum compatibility and security in a mixed-device environment.

A. WPA3 only is most secure but not compatible with legacy devices.

B. WPA2 only is secure but does not future-proof against WPA3-capable devices.

D. WPA/WPA2 mixed mode is weaker due to WPA (deprecated, insecure).

References (CompTIA Network+ N10-009):

Domain: Network Security — Wi-Fi encryption standards, WPA2 vs WPA3, mixed-mode compatibility.

A full-tunnel VPN forces a remote user’s traffic—including access to public internet resources—to traverse the corporate VPN tunnel and egress from the organization’s network. This is commonly required to ensure consistent enforcement of corporate security controls such as web filtering, IDS/IPS inspection, DLP policies, logging, and access control. In Network+ terms, full-tunnel VPNing routes the user’s default gateway through the VPN, meaning both internal traffic (to corporate subnets) and external traffic (to internet destinations) is sent through the encrypted tunnel.

By contrast, a split-tunnel VPN (not listed) would send only corporate-bound traffic through the VPN while allowing internet traffic to go directly out the user’s local ISP—reducing corporate bandwidth usage but also reducing centralized inspection and control. Clientless VPN usually refers to browser-based access to specific internal applications without a full network tunnel for all traffic. Site-to-site VPN connects entire networks to each other (e.g., branch office to HQ) rather than an individual remote user. SSE (Security Service Edge) is a cloud security framework/service model, not the classic VPN configuration described in the question. Hence, full-tunnel is the correct answer.

Understanding the Requirements

Network Address: 192.168.1.0/24

The /24 notation means a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0, providing 256 total addresses (192.168.1.0–192.168.1.255).

Usable hosts: 256 – 2 (network and broadcast) = 254.

Goal: Create 3 subnets, each with 30 hosts.

Each subnet needs enough addresses to accommodate 30 hosts, plus 2 reserved addresses (network and broadcast) per subnet.

Total addresses per subnet = 30 (hosts) + 2 (network/broadcast) = 32 addresses.

Subnetting Basics (Networking Fundamentals)

Subnet Mask: Determines how many bits are borrowed from the host portion to create subnets.

Original Mask: /24 (255.255.255.0) = 24 network bits, 8 host bits.

Formulae:

Number of subnets = 2^(number of borrowed bits).

Number of addresses per subnet = 2^(remaining host bits).

Usable hosts per subnet = 2^(remaining host bits) – 2.

We need:

At least 3 subnets.

At least 32 addresses per subnet (to fit 30 hosts + 2 reserved).

Step-by-Step Analysis

Determine Addresses Needed per Subnet:

32 addresses is a power of 2 (2^5 = 32).

This means each subnet requires 5 host bits (since 2^5 = 32 total addresses, and 32 – 2 = 30 usable hosts).

Calculate Remaining Bits:

Original network has 8 host bits (/24).

If 5 bits are left for hosts, we borrow: 8 – 5 = 3 bits for subnetting.

New Subnet Mask:

Original mask: /24 (24 network bits).

Borrow 3 bits: 24 + 3 = /27.

/27 = 255.255.255.224 (binary: 11111111.11111111.11111111.11100000).

Verify Requirements:

Number of Subnets: 2^3 = 8 subnets (meets the requirement of at least 3).

Addresses per Subnet: 2^5 = 32 addresses.

Usable Hosts per Subnet: 32 – 2 = 30 hosts (exactly meets the requirement).

Subnet Breakdown:

Increment: 256 – 224 = 32 (each subnet increments by 32 in the fourth octet).

Subnets:

192.168.1.0–192.168.1.31 (Network: .0, Broadcast: .31, Hosts: .1–.30)

192.168.1.32–192.168.1.63 (Network: .32, Broadcast: .63, Hosts: .33–.62)

192.168.1.64–192.168.1.95 (Network: .64, Broadcast: .95, Hosts: .65–.94)

(And 5 more subnets up to 192.168.1.255.)

Three subnets fit perfectly with 30 hosts each.

Evaluating the Options

A. 255.255.255.128 (/25):

Borrow 1 bit: 24 + 1 = /25.

Subnets: 2^1 = 2 (not enough, need 3).

Host bits: 7 (2^7 = 128 addresses, 126 hosts).

Why Not: Only 2 subnets, fails the requirement.

B. 255.255.255.192 (/26):

Borrow 2 bits: 24 + 2 = /26.

Subnets: 2^2 = 4 (meets 3).

Host bits: 6 (2^6 = 64 addresses, 62 hosts).

Why Not: 62 hosts exceeds 30, but it’s overkill; /27 is more efficient and still valid.

C. 255.255.255.224 (/27):

Borrow 3 bits: 24 + 3 = /27.

Subnets: 2^3 = 8 (meets 3).

Host bits: 5 (2^5 = 32 addresses, 30 hosts).

Why Yes: Perfectly fits 3 subnets with exactly 30 hosts each.

D. 255.255.255.240 (/28):

Borrow 4 bits: 24 + 4 = /28.

Subnets: 2^4 = 16 (meets 3).

Host bits: 4 (2^4 = 16 addresses, 14 hosts).

Why Not: Only 14 hosts per subnet, fails the 30-host requirement.

Why /27 (255.255.255.224) is Best

It provides exactly 30 usable hosts per subnet, avoiding waste while meeting the minimum requirement.

It allows 8 subnets, exceeding the need for 3, ensuring flexibility.

The study guide emphasizes efficient subnet design, and /27 balances host count and subnet availability.

CompTIA Network+ Context

Networking Fundamentals: Subnetting is a core skill, requiring understanding of CIDR, binary conversion, and address allocation.

Example from Study Guide: Similar problems calculate subnet masks for specific host counts, reinforcing /27 as a common solution for ~30 hosts.