CompTIA Updated N10-009 Exam Questions and Answers by ismael

Understanding 2.4GHz Interference:

The 2.4GHz frequency range is commonly used by many devices, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and various industrial equipment. This can lead to interference and degraded performance.

Mitigation Strategies:

5GHz Frequency:

The 5GHz frequency band offers more channels and less interference compared to the 2.4GHz band. Devices operating on 5GHz are less likely to encounter interference from other devices, including industrial equipment.

Non-overlapping Channels:

In the 2.4GHz band, using non-overlapping channels (such as channels 1, 6, and 11) can help reduce interference. Non-overlapping channels do not interfere with each other, providing clearer communication paths for Wi-Fi signals.

Why Other Options are Less Effective:

Mesh Network: While useful for extending network coverage, a mesh network does not inherently address interference issues.

Omnidirectional Antenna: This type of antenna broadcasts signals in all directions but does not mitigate interference.

Captive Portal: A web page that users must view and interact with before accessing a network, unrelated to frequency interference.

Ad Hoc Network: A decentralized wireless network that does not address interference issues directly.

Implementation:

Switch Wi-Fi devices to the 5GHz band if supported by the network infrastructure and client devices.

Configure Wi-Fi access points to use non-overlapping channels within the 2.4GHz band to minimize interference.

Inconsistent arrival of RTP (Real-Time Protocol) packets indicates jitter or latency variation. A protocol analyzer (packet sniffer, e.g., Wireshark) can capture and analyze RTP streams, showing delay, jitter, and packet loss statistics.

A. Toner and probe locates cable runs, not packet analysis.

C. Cable tester checks wiring faults, not packet timing.

D. Spectrum reader is for identifying wireless interference, not analyzing RTP traffic.

References (CompTIA Network+ N10-009):

Domain: Network Troubleshooting — Protocol analyzers, VoIP troubleshooting, jitter analysis.

Network Health:

WAN 2 appears to have a lower average latency and loss percentage, which would make it the preferred WAN station for VoIP traffic. VoIP traffic requires low latency and packet loss to ensure good voice quality and reliability. WAN 1 seems to have higher RAM and processor usage, which could also affect the performance of VoIP traffic.

Here's the summary of the key metrics for WAN 1 and WAN 2 from the image provided:

WAN 1:

Uplink Speed: 10G

Total Usage: 26.969GB Up / 1.748GB Down

Average Throughput: 353MBps Up / 23.42MBps Down

Loss: 2.51%

Average Latency: 24ms

Jitter: 9.5ms

WAN 2:

Uplink Speed: 1G

Total Usage: 930GB Up / 138GB Down

Average Throughput: 12.21MBps Up / 1.82MBps Down

Loss: 0.01%

Average Latency: 11ms

Jitter: 3.9ms

For VoIP traffic, low latency and jitter are particularly important to ensure voice quality. While WAN 1 has higher bandwidth and throughput, it also has higher latency and jitter compared to WAN 2. However, WAN 2 has much lower loss, lower latency, and lower jitter, which are more favorable for VoIP traffic that is sensitive to delays and variation in packet arrival times.

Given this information, WAN 2 would generally be preferred for VoIP traffic due to its lower latency, lower jitter, and significantly lower loss percentage, despite its lower bandwidth compared to WAN 1. The high bandwidth of WAN 1 may be more suitable for other types of traffic that are less sensitive to latency and jitter, such as bulk data transfers.

Device Monitoring:

the device that is experiencing connectivity issues is the APP Server or Router 1, which has a status of Down. This means that the server is not responding to network requests or sending any data. You may want to check the physical connection, power supply, and configuration of the APP Server to troubleshoot the problem.

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

•A. Isolate smart devices to their own network segment: Network segmentation using VLANs or separate SSIDs ensures that smart devices (like speakers) are not on the same network as guests, preventing unauthorized control.

•E. Change the default credentials: Many IoT devices (e.g., smart speakers) come with default usernames and passwords. If these are not changed, unauthorized users can easily take control.

•Why not the other options?

•B. Configure IPS: IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) detects threats but cannot block specific guest actions on an IoT device.

•C. Install a new AP: A new access point does not solve the unauthorized control issue.

•D. Set up a syslog server: Helps with logging, but does not prevent unauthorized access.

•F. Configure GRE: Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) is used for VPN tunneling, which is irrelevant in this case.