PMI Updated PMI-PBA Exam Questions and Answers by aryan

The next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards is to ensure that the requirements are validated. Validation is a process that confirms that the requirements align with the business objectives, stakeholder needs, and expected value of the project. Validation also ensures that the requirements are feasible, acceptable, and testable. Validation can be performed by using techniques such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, or demonstrations. Validation can help to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, or conflicts in the requirements before they are approved and implemented. Setting the priority of the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that determines the order and importance of the requirements based on their value, risk, urgency, or dependency. Priority can be set before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not verify or confirm that the requirements meet the stakeholder expectations or project goals. Communicating the requirements to stakeholders is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that involves sharing and presenting the requirements to relevant stakeholders for feedback, approval, or implementation. Communication can be done before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not check or ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business objectives or deliver value to the stakeholders. Baselineing the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that establishes an agreed-upon version of the requirements as a reference point for further changes or development. Baselineing can be done only after validating and approving the requirements, as it implies that they are complete, correct, clear, and consistent. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

Requirements are statements of the needs, expectations, or conditions that must be met by a solution. Requirements should be clear, complete, consistent, and testable, so that they can be understood, verified, and validated by the stakeholders. If the requirements are not ready for peer review, it means that they have not met these quality criteria, and that they need to be refined or revised. One possible cause of this situation is that the requirements do not provide all of the information needed to define the work, such as the scope, objectives, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, risks, dependencies, etc. This would make it difficult for the peer reviewers to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and alignment of the requirements with the business needs and goals. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. Some requirements having not yet been discussed in a work group session is not a reason to delay the peer review, as long as the requirements have been elicited from the relevant sources and documented properly. The requirements’ reference codes not tracing to the attribute numbers in the work breakdown structure is a minor issue that can be easily fixed by updating the reference codes or the work breakdown structure. The requirements documents having not yet received sign-off from the sponsor is not a prerequisite for peer review, as sign-off is usually obtained after the peer review and validation process. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

An interview is a technique that involves a structured or unstructured conversation between the business analyst and one or more stakeholders to elicit information, opinions, or feedback about a topic. An interview can be conducted face-to-face, over the phone, or through other communication channels. An interview can be prepared in advance with a list of questions or topics to cover, or it can be spontaneous and flexible. An interview can be used to explore the needs, expectations, preferences, or concerns of the stakeholders, as well as to clarify, verify, or validate the requirements. An interview is suitable for a project involving a low number of stakeholders, as it allows the business analyst to establish rapport, ask probing questions, and obtain detailed and specific information from each stakeholder. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

Power/interest grid is a technique that involves plotting the stakeholders on a matrix based on their level of power and interest in the project. Power/interest grid can help the business analyst to identify and categorize the stakeholders during the initial phase of a project by showing how influential and engaged each stakeholder is. Power/interest grid can also help to determine the appropriate communication and engagement strategy for each stakeholder group. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 61.