Amazon Web Services Updated MLS-C01 Exam Questions and Answers by rueben

 Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that can analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena can also query data from other sources, such as MySQL and Amazon Redshift, by using federated queries. Federated queries allow Amazon Athena to run SQL queries across data sources, such as relational and non-relational databases, data warehouses, and data lakes. By using Amazon Athena, the Data Scientist can perform an analysis by joining the three datasets from Amazon S3, MySQL, and Amazon Redshift, and then calculating the average of a few selected columns from the joined data. Amazon Athena can also integrate with other AWS services, such as AWS Glue and Amazon QuickSight, to provide additional features, such as data cataloging and visualization.

References:

• What is Amazon Athena? - Amazon Athena
• Federated Query Overview - Amazon Athena
• Querying Data from Amazon S3 - Amazon Athena
• Querying Data from MySQL - Amazon Athena
• [Querying Data from Amazon Redshift - Amazon Athena]

The best solution for this scenario is to perform forecasting by using claim IDs and dates to identify the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month. This solution has the following advantages:

• It leverages the historical data of claim outcomes and dates to capture the temporal patterns and trends of the claims in each category1.
• It does not require the claim contents or any other features to make predictions, which simplifies the data preparation and reduces the impact of missing or incomplete data2.
• It can handle the high cardinality of the outcome categories, as forecasting models can output multiple values for each time point3.
• It can provide predictions for several months in advance, which is useful for planning and budgeting purposes4.

The other solutions have the following drawbacks:

• A: Performing classification every month by using supervised learning of the 200 outcome categories based on claim contents is not suitable, because it assumes that the claim contents are available and complete for all the records, which is not the case in this scenario2. Moreover, classification models usually output a single label for each input, which is not adequate for predicting the number of claims in each category3. Additionally, classification models do not account for the temporal aspect of the data, which is important for forecasting1.
• B: Performing reinforcement learning by using claim IDs and dates and instructing the insurance agents who submit the claim records to estimate the expected number of claims in each outcome category every month is not feasible, because it requires a feedback loop between the model and the agents, which might not be available or reliable in this scenario5. Furthermore, reinforcement learning is more suitable for sequential decision making problems, where the model learns from its actions and rewards, rather than forecasting problems, where the model learns from historical data and outputs future values6.
• D: Performing classification by using supervised learning of the outcome categories for which partial information on claim contents is provided and performing forecasting by using claim IDs and dates for all other outcome categories is not optimal, because it combines two different methods that might not be consistent or compatible with each other7. Also, this solution suffers from the same limitations as solution A, such as the dependency on claim contents, the inability to handle multiple outputs, and the ignorance of temporal patterns123.

References:

• 1: Time Series Forecasting - Amazon SageMaker
• 2: Handling Missing Data for Machine Learning | AWS Machine Learning Blog
• 3: Forecasting vs Classification: What’s the Difference? | DataRobot
• 4: Amazon Forecast – Time Series Forecasting Made Easy | AWS News Blog
• 5: Reinforcement Learning - Amazon SageMaker
• 6: What is Reinforcement Learning? The Complete Guide | Edureka
• 7: Combining Machine Learning Models | by Will Koehrsen | Towards Data Science

 To find the most discussed topics in the comments that are in either English or Spanish, the machine learning specialist needs to perform two steps: first, translate the comments from Spanish to English if necessary, and second, apply a topic modeling algorithm to the comments. The following options are valid ways to accomplish these steps using AWS services:

• Option C: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon Comprehend topic modeling to find the topics. Amazon Translate is a neural machine translation service that delivers fast, high-quality, and affordable language translation. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to find insights and relationships in text. Amazon Comprehend topic modeling is a feature that automatically organizes a collection of text documents into topics that contain commonly used words and phrases.
• Option E: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) to find the topics. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly. Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) is an unsupervised learning algorithm that is used to organize a corpus of documents into topics that contain word groupings based on their statistical distribution.

The other options are not valid because:

• Option A: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a text classification and word embedding algorithm. It cannot find the topics independently from language, as different languages have different word distributions and semantics.
• Option B: Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm is not a translation algorithm, but a sequence-to-sequence learning algorithm that can be used for tasks such as summarization, chatbot, and question answering. Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm is a topic modeling algorithm, but it requires the input documents to be in the same language and preprocessed into a bag-of-words format.
• Option D: Amazon Lex is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. It cannot extract topics from the content, but only intents and slots based on a predefined bot configuration. References:
• Amazon Translate
• Amazon Comprehend
• Amazon SageMaker
• Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm
• Amazon SageMaker BlazingText
• Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq
• Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Algorithm
• Amazon Lex

The most effective way to encode this categorical feature into a numeric feature is to use Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler similarity encoding on the column to create embeddings of vectors of real numbers. Similarity encoding is a technique that transforms categorical features into numerical features by computing the similarity between the categories. Similarity encoding can handle high cardinality and redundancy in categorical features, as it can group similar categories together based on their string similarity. For example, if the column contains the values “aspirin”, “asprin”, and “ibuprofen”, similarity encoding will assign a high similarity score to “aspirin” and “asprin”, and a low similarity score to “ibuprofen”. Similarity encoding can also create embeddings of vectors of real numbers, which can be used as input for machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that enables you to prepare data for machine learning quickly and easily. You can use SageMaker Data Wrangler to apply similarity encoding to a column of categorical data, and generate embeddings of vectors of real numbers that capture the similarity between the categories1. The other options are either less effective or more complex to implement. Spell checking the column and using one-hot encoding would require additional steps and resources, and may not capture all the misspellings or redundancies. One-hot encoding would also create a large number of features, which could increase the dimensionality and sparsity of the data. Ordinal encoding would assign an arbitrary order to the categories, which could introduce bias or noise in the data. References:

• 1: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler – Amazon Web Services