| Exam Name: | PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam | ||
| Exam Code: | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Dumps | ||
| Vendor: | PECB | Certification: | ISO 27001 |
| Questions: | 334 Q&A's | Shared By: | arianna |
Scenario 4: FinSecure
Finsecure is a financial institution based in Finland, providing services to a diverse clientele, encompassing retail banking, corporate banking, wealth management, and digital banking, all tailored to meet the evolving financial needs of individuals and businesses in the region. Recognizing the critical importance of information security in the modern banking landscape, FinSecure has initiated the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. To ensure the successful implementation of the ISMS, the top management decided to contract two experts to lead and oversee the ISMS implementation project.
As a primary strategy for implementing the ISMS, the experts chose an approach that emphasizes a swift implementation of the ISMS by initially meeting the minimum requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, followed by continual improvement over time. Additionally, under the guidance of experts, FinSecure opted for a methodological framework, which serves as a structured framework that outlines the high-level stages of the ISMS implementation, the associated activities, and the deliverables without incorporating any specific tools.
The experts conducted a risk assessment, identifying all the supporting assets, which were the most tangible ones. They assessed the potential consequences and likelihood of various risks, determining the level of risks using a methodical approach that involved defining and characterizing the terms and criteria used in the assessment process. These risks were categorized into nonnumerical levels (e g., very low, low. moderate, high, very high). Explanatory notes were thoughtfully crafted to justify assessed values, with the primary goal of enhancing repeatability and reproducibility.
After completing the risk assessment, the experts reviewed a selected number of the security controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 to determine which ones were applicable to the company's specific context. The decision to implement security controls was justified by the risk assessment results. Based on this review, they drafted the Statement of Applicability (SoA). They focused on treating only the high-risk category particularly addressing unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures. To address these issues, they established a new version of the access control policy, implemented controls to manage and control user access, and introduced a control for ICT readiness to ensure business continuity.
Their risk assessment report indicated that if the implemented security controls reduce the risk levels to an acceptable threshold, those risks will be accepted
Question:
Did FinSecure identify information system components on which one or several business assets are based?
Scenario 1: HealthGenic is a pediatric clinic that monitors the health and growth of individuals from infancy to early adulthood using a web-based medical software. The software is also used to schedule appointments, create customized medical reports, store patients' data and medical history, and communicate with all the [^involved parties, including parents, other physicians, and the medical laboratory staff.
Last month, HealthGenic experienced a number of service interruptions due to the increased number of users accessing the software Another issue the company faced while using the software was the complicated user interface, which the untrained personnel found challenging to use.
The top management of HealthGenic immediately informed the company that had developed the software about the issue. The software company fixed the issue; however, in the process of doing so, it modified some files that comprised sensitive information related to HealthGenic's patients. The modifications that were made resulted in incomplete and incorrect medical reports and, more importantly, invaded the patients' privacy.
Which situation described in scenario 1 represents a threat to HealthGenic?
Scenario 7: InfoSec is a multinational corporation headquartered in Boston, MA, which provides professional electronics, gaming, and entertainment services. After facing numerous information security incidents, InfoSec has decided to establish teams and implement measures to prevent potential incidents in the future
Emma, Bob. and Anna were hired as the new members of InfoSec's information security team, which consists of a security architecture team, an incident response team (IRT) and a forensics team Emma's job is to create information security plans, policies, protocols, and training to prepare InfoSec to respond to incidents effectively Emma and Bob would be full-time employees of InfoSec, whereas Anna was contracted as an external consultant.
Bob, a network expert, will deploy a screened subnet network architecture This architecture will isolate the demilitarized zone (OMZ) to which hosted public services are attached and InfoSec's publicly accessible resources from their private network Thus, InfoSec will be able to block potential attackers from causing unwanted events inside the company's network. Bob is also responsible for ensuring that a thorough evaluation of the nature of an unexpected event is conducted, including the details on how the event happened and what or whom it might affect.
Anna will create records of the data, reviews, analysis, and reports in order to keep evidence for the purpose of disciplinary and legal action, and use them to prevent future incidents. To do the work accordingly, she should be aware of the company's information security incident management policy beforehand
Among others, this policy specifies the type of records to be created, the place where they should be kept, and the format and content that specific record types should have.
Based on scenario 7, what should Anna be aware of when gathering data?
Scenario 7: Yefund, an insurance Company headquartered in Monaco, is a reliable name in Commerce, industry, and Corporate services. With a rich history spanning decades, Yefund has consistently delivered
tailored insurance solutions to businesses of all sizes. safeguarding their assets and mitigating risks. As a forward-thinking company, Yetund recognizes the importance of information security in protecting
sensitive data and maintaining the trust Of Its clients. Thus, has embarked on a transformative journey towards implemenung an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001-
iS implementing cutting-edge Al technologies within its ISMS to improve the identification and management Of information assets, Through Al. is automating the identification Of assets. tracking
changes over time. and strategically selecting controls based on asset sensitivity and exposure. This proactive approach ensures that Yefund remains agile and adaptive in safeguarding critical information assets
against emerging threats. Although Yetund recognized the urgent need to enhance its security posture, the implementation team took a gradual approach to integrate each ISMS element- Rather than waiting for
an official launch, they carefully tested and validated security controls, gradually putting each element into operational mode as it was completed and approved. This methodical process ensured that critical
security measures, such as encryption protocols. access controls. and monitoring systems. were fully operational and effective in safeguarding customer information, including personal. policy, and financial
details.
Recently. Kian. a member of Vefund's information security team. identified two security events. Upon evaluation. one reported incident did not meet the criteria to be classified as such- However, the second
incident. involving critical network components experiencing downtime. raised concerns about potential risks to sensitive data security and was therefore categorized as an incident. The first event was recorded
as a report without further action, whereas the second incident prompted a series Of actions, including investigation. containment, eradication, recovery. resolution, closure, incident reporting, and post-incident
activities. Additionally. IRTS were established to address the events according to their Categorization.
After the incident. Yetund recognized the development of internal communication protocols as the single need to improve their ISMS framework It determined the relevance of communication aspects such as
what, when, with whom. and how to Communicate effectively Yefund decided to focus On developing internal communication protocols, reasoning that internal coordination their most immediate priority. This
decision was made despite having external stakeholders. such as clients and regulatory bodies. who also required secure and timely communication.
Additionally, Yefund has prioritized the professional development Of its employees through comprehensive training programs, Yefund assessed the effectiveness and impact Of its training initiatives through
Kirkpatrick's four-level training evaluation model. From measuring trainees' involvement and impressions of the training (Level 1) to evaluating learning outcomes (Level 2), post-training behavior (Level 3), and
tangible results (Level 4), Yefund ensures that Its training programs ate holistic. impactful. and aligned With organizational objectives.
Yefund•s journey toward implementing an ISMS reflects a commitment to security, innovation, and continuous improvement, By leveraging technology, fostering a culture Of proactive vigilance, enhancing
communication ptotOCOlS, and investing in employee development. Yefund seeks to fortify its position as a trusted partner in safeguarding the interests Of its Clients and stakeholders.
Based on scenario 7, is Yefund's integration of ISMS elements acceptable?