ITIL Updated ITIL-4-Foundation Exam Questions and Answers by keziah

In ITIL 4, the service level management practice is responsible for setting clear, agreed targets for service performance and ensuring that services are delivered in line with these targets.

A key tool used in this practice is the service level agreement (SLA). An SLA is an agreement between a service provider and a customer that:

Defines the expected level of service

Documents specific, measurable service targets (such as availability, response time, resolution time)

Provides a basis to monitor and measure performance against those targets

Because SLAs describe measurable service targets and are used to assess whether the service provider is meeting those targets, they are explicitly used as a tool to help define and measure performance. This aligns directly with the wording in the question.

A. A continual improvement register (CIR)The CIR is used in the continual improvement practice to record, track, and manage improvement opportunities and activities. It supports managing improvements, not defining and measuring service performance targets.

B. An incident recordThis belongs to the incident management practice. Incident records are used to log, manage, and track incidents (unplanned interruptions or reductions in service). They are not designed as tools to define or measure ongoing service performance.

C. A change schedulePart of the change enablement practice, the change schedule is used to plan and communicate the timing of changes. It coordinates when changes will occur but does not define or measure service performance levels.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. A service level agreement, as it is the formal tool used to define and measure service performance in ITIL 4.

ITIL 4 Foundation: Service level management practice – purpose and key terms (including service level agreements)

ITIL 4 Foundation: Concept of SLAs as documents that define and measure service performance targets

ITIL 4 Foundation: Overviews of Continual Improvement, Incident Management, and Change Enablement practices and their key records (CIR, incident records, change schedules)

When a supplier modifies the contract they offer to your organization, this represents a change that can affect services, service components, costs, risks, and agreed service levels.

In ITIL 4, the purpose of the change enablement practice is to maximize the number of successful service and product changes by ensuring that risks are properly assessed, authorizing changes to proceed, and managing the change schedule. This includes changes that arise from external parties such as suppliers, not just technical changes inside IT.

A contract modification by a supplier can:

alter delivery terms or service performance

introduce new risks (financial, operational, compliance)

require changes to service design, support, or architecture

Because of this, it should go through change enablement, where:

the risk to services is assessed

the impact on existing services and customers is evaluated

a decision is made whether to approve, reject, or modify the proposed change

coordination with other practices (like supplier management and service level management) may occur, but the formal risk assessment and authorization of the change are part of change enablement.

Why the other options are less appropriate:

A. Incident management

Focuses on restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible after an unplanned interruption or reduction in quality.

It reacts to incidents; it does not manage contractual changes or assess risks from supplier contract modifications.

B. Service level management

Ensures SLAs and service targets are defined, agreed, and monitored with customers.

While it may be involved in understanding how a supplier change affects SLAs, it is not the primary practice responsible for overall risk assessment and authorization of such changes.

C. Service request management

Deals with predefined, user-initiated requests, such as password resets or standard access requests.

It is operational and transactional and not concerned with supplier contract changes or service risk assessment.

D. Change enablement

Specifically designed to assess, authorize, and manage changes to services and service components, including those triggered by changes in supplier contracts.

Therefore, it is the MOST appropriate practice for assessing the risk to services in this scenario.

So, the practice that would be most involved in assessing the risk to services when a supplier modifies their contract is D. Change enablement.

AXELOS – ITIL Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition, Change Enablement practice purpose and description

AXELOS – ITIL 4 Practice Guides (Change Enablement, Service Level Management, Incident Management, Service Request Management)

“Service desk staff require training and competency across a number of broad technical and business areas. In particular, they need to demonstrate excellent customer service skills such as empathy, incident analysis and prioritization, effective communication, and emotional intelligence.

https://www.servicedeskinstitute.com/the-case-for-itil4-foundation-service-desk-analyst-training/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CService%20desk%20staff%20require%20training,effective%20communication%2C%20and%20emotional%20intelligence.

A change that must be implemented as soon as possible without strictly following the standard process e.g. to resolve an incident or implement a security patch.

The process for assessment and authorization is expedited to ensure quick implementation, so scheduling and documentation is not a priority.

The change authority may be separate from what is standard or normal practice, typically smaller in number but with greater capacity to expedite approval.

https://www.bmc.com/blogs/itil-change-enablement/