IIA Updated IIA-CIA-Part1 Exam Questions and Answers by artemis

According to the IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards), when internal audit staff lacks the required knowledge or expertise to perform an engagement, the chief audit executive (CAE) should consider obtaining additional resources with the necessary expertise. This approach ensures that the assurance engagement can be conducted with the requisite level of competence and fulfills the standards' mandate for proficiency and due professional care (Standard 1210: Proficiency).

IIA Standard 1210: Proficiency.

Risk analysis involves assessing both the impact and likelihood of risks, and these should be assessed together. This combined assessment helps in understanding the full scope of potential risks and is crucial for effective risk management and prioritization.

IIA guidance and risk management frameworks like COSO and ISO 31000.QUESTION NO: 459

According to IIA guidance, which of the following statements is true with regard to the chief audit executive's (CAE's) responsibility for conducting a self-assessment of the internal audit activity?

1 The CAE should select an independent reviewer or review team to perform sufficient tests of the self-assessment to validate the results

2 The CAE should validate results by engaging experienced audit professionals from a separate internal audit activity outside of the organization to reperform all of the tests conducted for the assessment

3. The CAE should select independent, nonaudit professionals who are knowledgeable about the organization and the industry in which it operates to assist with performing the self-assessment

4. The CAE may consider performing a self-assessment with independent external validation in Iieu of performing a full external assessment

A. 1 and 2 only.

B. 1 and 4 only

C. 1, 2, and 3

D. 3 and 4

Answer: B

According to IIA guidance, the chief audit executive (CAE) may consider performing a self-assessment with independent external validation in lieu of performing a full external assessment. This is known as a self-assessment with independent validation (SAIV) and is acceptable as a part of the internal audit activity’s quality assurance and improvement program. Choosing an independent reviewer or review team to perform sufficient tests of the self-assessment to validate the results is also aligned with IIA standards for maintaining quality within the internal audit function.References: IIA Standard 1300: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program, which outlines requirements for ongoing and periodic reviews of the internal audit activity.

According to IIA guidance, it is appropriate for an internal auditor to determine whether the organization has adequate controls to achieve its CSR objectives and to facilitate a management self-assessment of CSR controls and results. These activities are within the scope of internal auditing as they involve evaluating the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes. Consulting on project design and implementation for CSR or excluding external risks goes beyond the typical role of internal auditing, which is to provide independent assurance.

The IIA's guidance on the role of internal auditing in organizational governance and control evaluations.

Ongoing monitoring and periodic internal quality assessments best serve to deter unethical behavior and encourage objectivity among internal auditors. These quality assessments ensure that audit activities conform to professional standards and that auditors uphold principles such as objectivity. This approach provides a structured and systematic review of audit processes and practices, which reinforces the importance of adherence to ethical standards and professional conduct.

IIA guidance on ethics and objectivity, and Standard 1300: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program.