Cyber AB Updated CMMC-CCP Exam Questions and Answers by zorawar

Who is Responsible for Marking CUI?According toDoDI 5200.48 (Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)), the responsibility for marking CUI falls on theauthorized holder of the information.

Definition of an Authorized Holder

PerDoDI 5200.48, Section 3.4, anauthorized holderis anyone who has beengranted accessto CUI and is responsible for handling, safeguarding, and marking it according toDoD CUI policy.

The authorized holder may be:

ADoD employee

Acontractorhandling CUI

Anyorganization or individual authorizedto access and manage CUI

DoD Guidance on CUI Marking Responsibilities

DoDI 5200.48, Section 4.2:

The individual creating or handling CUImust apply the appropriate markings as per the DoD CUI Registry guidelines.

DoDI 5200.48, Section 5.2:

Themarking responsibility is NOT limited to a specific positionlike an Information Disclosure Official or a high-level DoD office.

Instead, it is theresponsibility of the person or entity generating, handling, or disseminatingthe CUI.

Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) DoD OUSD (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense):

The OUSD plays apolicy-setting rolebut doesnot directly mark CUI.

(C) Information Disclosure Official:

This role is responsible forpublic release of information, but marking CUI is the duty of theauthorized holdermanaging the data.

(D) Presidential authorized Original Classification Authority (OCA):

OCAs classifynational security information (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret), not CUI, which isnot classified information.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:Final Validation from DoDI 5200.48:PerDoDI 5200.48, authorized holders are explicitly responsible for marking CUI, making this the correct answer.

TheCybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Process (CAP)outlines strict guidelines regardingconflicts of interest (COI)to ensure the integrity and impartiality of assessments conducted byCertified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs)andCertified Assessors (CAs).

The scenario presented involves apotential conflict of interestdue to a prior relationship (former college roommate) between thecertified assessorand an individual at theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC). While this prior relationship does not automatically disqualify the assessor, it must bedisclosed, documented, and mitigated appropriately.

Inform the OSC and C3PAO of the Potential Conflict of Interest

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)requires assessors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Transparency ensures that all parties, including theOSC and C3PAO, are aware of the situation.

Document the Conflict and Mitigation Actions in the Assessment Plan

PerCMMC CAP documentation, potential conflicts should be assessed based on their material impact on the objectivity of the assessment.

The conflict and proposed mitigation strategies must beformally recorded in the assessment planto provide an audit trail.

Determine If the Mitigation Actions Are Acceptable

If theOSC and C3PAOdetermine that the mitigation actions adequatelyeliminate or reduce the risk of bias, the assessment may proceed.

Common mitigation strategies include:

Assigning another assessor forinterviews with the conflicted individual.

Ensuring thatdecisions regarding the OSC’s compliance are reviewed independently.

Proceed with the Assessment If Mitigation Is Acceptable

If the mitigation actions sufficiently address the conflict, the assessment may continue understrict adherence to documented procedures.

CMMC Conflict of Interest Handling Process

A. Do not inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect. This violates CMMC’s integrity requirements and could result indisciplinary actions against the assessor or invalidation of the assessment. Transparency is mandatory.

B. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest, and start the entire process over without the conflicted team member.❌Incorrect. The CAP doesnotmandate immediate reassignment unless the conflict isunresolvable. Instead, mitigation strategies should be considered first.

C. Inform the OSC and the C3PAO of the possible conflict of interest but since it has been an acceptable amount of time since college, no conflict of interest exists, and continue as planned.❌Incorrect.The passage of time alone does not automatically eliminate a conflict of interest. Proper documentation and mitigation are still required.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines COI requirements and mitigation actions.

CMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)– Outlines ethical responsibilities of assessors.

CMMC Accreditation Body (Cyber-AB) Guidance– Provides rules on conflict resolution.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option D is the most correct choice, as it aligns with the official CMMC conflict of interest procedures.

Understanding SI.L2-3.14.6: Monitor Communications for AttacksThe practiceSI.L2-3.14.6fromNIST SP 800-171(aligned with CMMC Level 2) requires an organization tomonitor organizational communications for indicators of attack. This typically includes:

✅Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)andIntrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)

✅Log analysis and network monitoring

✅Incident response planningfor detected threats

As part of aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)must ensure that theOSC (Organization Seeking Certification)hasproperly implemented and documenteditsmonitoring capabilities.

TheCCA must collect sufficient objective evidenceto determine compliance.

Reviewing anartifact(such as system configurations, IDS/IPS logs, or security policies)helps validatethat intrusion detection is properly implemented.

Configuration settings providedirect evidenceof whethermonitoring for attacksis effectively applied.

Why "Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Conduct a penetration test

❌Incorrect–Penetration testing isnot requiredfor CMMC Level 2 assessments and falls outside an assessor's responsibilities.

B. Interview the intrusion detection system's supplier.

❌Incorrect–Thesupplier does not determine compliance; the assessor needs evidence from theOSC’s implementation.

C. Upload known malicious code and observe the system response.

❌Incorrect–This would beinvasive testing, which isnot part of a CMMC assessment.

D. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

✅Correct – Reviewing system artifacts provides direct evidence of compliance with SI.L2-3.14.6.

NIST SP 800-171 SI.L2-3.14.6– Requires monitoring communications for attack indicators.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Describesartifact reviewas an essential assessment method.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

This aligns withCMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessment requirementsandSI.L2-3.14.6 compliance verification.

Understanding High-Level Scoping in a CMMC AssessmentDuringHigh-Level Scoping, aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)determines thepeople, processes, and technologythat are within scope for theCMMC Level 1 or Level 2 assessment.

Supporting Organization/Unitsrefer to thespecific groups, departments, or teamsthat handleControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)orFederal Contract Information (FCI)and are responsible for applyingCMMC security practices.

These units aredirectly involved in the contract's executionand are included in the CMMC assessment scope.

Key Term: Supporting Organization/Units

A. Host Unit → Incorrect

This term is not used inCMMC assessment scoping.

B. Branch Office → Incorrect

Abranch officemay or may not be in scope; scoping is based onwhether the unit handles CUI or FCI, not its physical location.

C. Coordinating Unit → Incorrect

No official CMMC term refers to a "Coordinating Unit."

D. Supporting Organization/Units → Correct

This termcorrectly describes the entities that apply security controls for the contract and are within the CMMC assessment scope.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Supporting Organization/Units"?

CMMC Scoping Guidance for Level 1 & Level 2 Assessments

DefinesSupporting Organization/Unitsasin-scope entities responsible for implementing cybersecurity controls.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

Specifies that theC3PAO must identify and document the units responsible for security compliance.

DoD CMMC 2.0 Guidance on Scoping

Requires theassessment team to define the people, processes, and technology that fall within the scopeof the assessment.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer: