Cyber AB Updated CMMC-CCP Exam Questions and Answers by rowan

TheLimited Practice Deficiency Correction Evaluationprocess occurs when anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)has undergone aCMMC Level 2 Assessmentby aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)and hasunresolved deficienciesin some security practices.

According toCMMC 2.0 policy and DFARS 252.204-7021, OSCs can still achieveInterim Certificationif they meet theminimum thresholdof security practices while addressing deficiencies through aPlan of Action & Milestones (POA&M).

TheCMMC 2.0 Interim Rulestates that an OSCmust meet at least 100 out of 110 practicesto qualify for aPOA&M-based remediation.

A maximum of 10 practices can be listed in the POA&Mfor later correction.

Failure to meet at least 100 practices results in failing the assessment outright, requiring a full reassessment after remediation.

The Lead Assessor can recommend POA&M placementonly if the OSC meets at least 100 practices.

Less than 100 practices scored as MET means the OSC does not qualify for a POA&Mand mustretest completely.

DFARS 252.204-7021 and CMMC 2.0 policiesconfirm the100-practice thresholdfor conditional certification.

A. 80 practices (Incorrect)– Falls well below the 100-practice requirement.

B. 88 practices (Incorrect)– Still below the POA&M eligibility threshold.

D. 110 practices (Incorrect)– While meeting 110 practices would be ideal,CMMC allows a POA&M option at 100 practices.

The correct answer isC. 100 practices, as this meets theminimum threshold for POA&M-based Interim Certification.

CA.L2-3.12.1:"Periodically assess the security controls in organizational systems to determine if the controls are effective in their application."

This control is derived fromNIST SP 800-171, Requirement 3.12.1, which mandates organizations to performregular security control assessmentsto ensure compliance and effectiveness.

Evidence Review & Assessment Timeline:

The organization's procedureexplicitly statesthat security control assessments must be conductedquarterly(every three months).

Since the Lead Assessor only has access to thefirst-quarter report, the second-quarter report is missing at the time of assessment.

CMMC Audit Requirements:

For an assessor to rate a control asMET, sufficient evidence must bereadily availableat the time of evaluation.

Since the second-quarter report is missingat the time of assessment, the Lead Assessorcannot verify compliancewith the organization's own stated frequency of assessment.

Why the Answer is NOT A, C, or D:

A (Sufficient, MET)→Incorrect: The control assessment frequency is quarterly, but the evidence for Q2 is not available. Compliance cannot be confirmed.

C (Sufficient, and re-rate later)→Incorrect: If evidence is not available during the audit, the controlcannot be rated as MET initially. There is no provision in CMMC 2.0 to "conditionally" pass a control pending future evidence.

D (Insufficient, but re-rate later)→Incorrect: Once a control is ratedNOT MET, it staysNOT METuntil a re-assessment is conducted in a new audit cycle. The assessordoes not adjust ratings retroactivelybased on future evidence.

Control Reference: CA.L2-3.12.1Assessment Criteria & Justification for the Correct Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide (2023):

"For a control to be rated as MET, the assessed organization must provide sufficient evidence at the time of the assessment."

"If evidence is missing or incomplete, the finding shall be rated as NOT MET."

NIST SP 800-171A (Security Requirement Assessment Guide):

"Evidence must be current, relevant, and sufficient to demonstrate compliance with stated periodicity requirements."

Since the procedure mandatesquarterly assessments, missing evidence means compliancecannot be validated.

DoD CMMC Scoping Guidance:

"Assessors shall base their determination on the evidence provided at the time of assessment. If required evidence is not available, the control shall be rated as NOT MET."

Official CMMC 2.0 References Supporting the Answer:

Final Conclusion:Thecorrect answer is Bbecause the required evidence (the second-quarter report) is not availableat the time of assessment, making itinsufficientto validate compliance. The Lead Assessormust rate the control as NOT METin accordance with CMMC 2.0 assessment rules.

Understanding IA.L1-3.5.1 (Identification and Authentication Requirements)TheCMMC 2.0 Level 1practiceIA.L1-3.5.1aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Requirement 3.5.1, which mandates that organizationsidentify system users, processes acting on behalf of users, and devicesto ensure proper access control.

To comply with this requirement, anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)must maintain documentation that demonstrates:

A unique identifier (username) for each system user

Mapping of system accounts to specific individuals

Identification of devices and automated processes that access systems

This documentation directly satisfies IA.L1-3.5.1because it showshow system users are uniquely identified and linked to specific accountswithin the environment.

Alist of users and their assigned accountsconfirms that the organization has a structured method oftracking access and authentication.

It allows auditors to verify thateach user has a distinct identityand that access control mechanisms are properly applied.

A. Procedures for implementing access control lists (Incorrect)

While access control lists (ACLs) are relevant for authorization, they do notidentify users or devicesspecifically, making them insufficient as primary evidence for IA.L1-3.5.1.

B. List of unauthorized users that identifies their identities and roles (Incorrect)

Identifying unauthorized users does not fulfill the requirement of trackingauthorizedusers, devices, and processes.

D. Physical access policy stating "All non-employees must wear a special visitor pass or be escorted" (Incorrect)

This pertains tophysical security, not system-baseduser identification and authentication.

The correct answer isC. User names associated with system accounts assigned to those individuals, as thisdirectly satisfies the identification requirement of IA.L1-3.5.1.

Step 1: Understand the Assessment Phases (CAP v1.0)TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)outlines a structured lifecycle for assessments, including:

Plan and Prepare Phase– Develop the assessment plan (before the assessment starts).

Conduct Assessment Phase– Execute the actual assessment activities.

Report Results Phase– Finalize and deliver the assessment outcomes.

CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5 (Conduct Assessment):

“The assessment team collects, examines, and evaluates evidence to determine if practices are MET or NOT MET.”

During the“Conduct Assessment” phase, the main activity is to:

Collect evidence(documentation, interviews, testing),

Validate adequacy and sufficiency,

Score practicesas MET/NOT MET.

✅Step 2: Why “Collect and Examine Evidence” Is the Primary ActivityThis is thecore responsibilityof assessorswhile conductingan assessment.

A. Develop assessment plan✘ This occurs in thePlan and Preparephasebeforeconducting the assessment.

C. Verify readiness to conduct assessment✘ Readiness verification is part ofpre-assessment activities, not during the assessment itself.

D. Deliver recommended assessment results✘ This is done during theReport Resultsphase after the assessment has been conducted.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Theprimary activity performed during the actual executionof a CMMC assessment iscollecting and examining evidenceto determine compliance with practices.