PECB Certified OHSMS ISO 45001 Lead Auditor Exam ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions with Experts Answers Updated Recently

Clause 9.3 of ISO 45001:2018 outlines the requirements for management reviews. These reviews must evaluate the performance of the OHSMS and identify opportunities for improvement. Outputs of management reviews typically include decisions and actions that align with strategic and operational priorities.

Analysis of Options:

A. Decisions related to continual improvement opportunities:This is a valid output, as continual improvement is a key objective of management reviews under Clause 10.3.

B. Allocation of a bigger budget for the OHS department:Resource allocation is a common output of management reviews to address identified needs.

C. Improvements in the OHSMS:Improvements reflect the organization’s commitment to enhancing safety performance.

D. Minutes of previous management reviews:While minutes provide context, they are not an output of the current management review.

E. Opportunities to integrate the OHS management system with other business processes:Integration opportunities are valid outputs, as they enhance the system ' s effectiveness.

F. Plan to prioritize health and safety issues as a business strategy:Strategic alignment of health and safety with business objectives is an expected output.

G. Procurement of new safety harnesses for workers:This is an operational action, not a direct output of the management review process.

H. Report showing the trend of an increase in safety incidents:This is an input to the management review, not an output.

I. Updates to the risk register:Risk register updates reflect changes in identified hazards and risks, making this a valid output.

J. Worker feedback of positive and negative comments:Worker feedback is an input to the management review, not an output.

ISO References:

Clause 9.3: Management review inputs and outputs.

Clause 10.3: Continual improvement actions.

Follow-up audits verify that corrective actions have been implemented effectively and address the root cause of the nonconformities.

Analysis of Options:

A. Review the latest emergency response drill report:Correct. This verifies whether emergency response processes are functional and effective.

B. Check if the internal audit schedule was revised:Incorrect. While beneficial, this is not directly related to closing out the nonconformity.

C. Check safety data sheets for completeness:Incorrect. While this ensures compliance, it is not directly related to verifying corrective actions.

D. Check if revised procedures were signed off:Correct. This confirms that changes were properly documented and approved.

E. Determine whether an updated risk assessment was carried out:Correct. Risk assessments confirm the effectiveness of new controls.

F. Inspect areas for safe chemical storage and handling:Correct. Direct observation ensures that corrective actions are implemented effectively.

G. Interview staff on revised emergency procedures:Incorrect. While important, this does not directly address the effectiveness of corrective actions for chemical storage.

H. Interview the OH and S Manager about additional objectives:Incorrect. This is unrelated to the specific nonconformities raised.

ISO References:

Clause 10.2.2: Verification of corrective actions.

Clause 8.1.2: Hazard identification and controls.