Isaca Updated CDPSE Exam Questions and Answers by annabella

The best way for an organization to maintain the effectiveness of its privacy breach incident response plan is to conduct annual data privacy tabletop exercises. A tabletop exercise is a simulated scenario that tests the organization’s ability to respond to a privacy breach incident in a realistic and interactive way. A tabletop exercise can help the organization to evaluate the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team, identify the gaps and weaknesses in the plan, improve the communication and coordination among the stakeholders, and update the plan based on the lessons learned and best practices12. A tabletop exercise can also enhance the awareness and readiness of the organization to handle privacy breach incidents in a timely and effective manner3. References:

ISACA CDPSE Review Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2

ISACA Journal, Volume 4, 2019, “Tabletop Exercises: Three Sample Scenarios”

ISACA Journal, Volume 6, 2017, “Privacy Breach Response: Preparing for the Inevitable”

A consent management platform (CMP) directly supports control over personal data processing by tracking and enforcing individuals’ consent preferences across systems. SIEM (A) monitors security events, ERP (C) supports operations, and DLP (D) protects against data leakage but does not manage lawful basis for processing.

“Consent management tools ensure personal data is processed only in line with valid consent or lawful basis.”

A third-party privacy control assessment is an independent and objective evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the privacy controls implemented by an organization to protect personal data and comply with privacy laws and regulations. A third-party privacy control assessment can help senior management to verify the success of its commitment to privacy by design, by providing the following benefits:

It can measure the extent to which the organization has adopted and integrated the principles and practices of privacy by design throughout its products, services, processes and systems.

It can identify the strengths and weaknesses of the organization’s privacy governance, policies, procedures, standards and guidelines, and provide recommendations for improvement.

It can validate the organization’s compliance with the applicable privacy requirements and expectations of its customers, stakeholders, regulators and auditors.

It can enhance the organization’s reputation and trustworthiness as a responsible and transparent data controller and processor.

The other options are less effective or irrelevant for verifying the success of the commitment to privacy by design. Reviewing the findings of an industry benchmarking assessment may provide some insights into how the organization compares with its peers or competitors in terms of privacy performance, but it may not reflect the specific privacy goals, risks and challenges of the organization. Identifying trends in the organization’s amount of compromised personal data or number of privacy incidents may indicate some aspects of the organization’s privacy maturity, but they are reactive and lagging indicators that do not capture the proactive and preventive nature of privacy by design. Moreover, these metrics may not account for other factors that may influence the occurrence or impact of data breaches or privacy violations, such as external threats, human errors or environmental changes.