Fortinet Updated NSE7_SSE_AR-26 Exam Questions and Answers by isobelle

FortiSASE Secure Private Access can integrate with existing FortiGate SD-WAN infrastructure to provide cloud-delivered security enforcement and connectivity to privately hosted enterprise applications.

Option C is correct because FortiSASE acts as a security enforcement point for traffic entering its cloud infrastructure. Administrators can apply security profiles and traffic policies before permitted sessions are forwarded toward private resources through the established SD-WAN connectivity.

Option D is correct because SD-WAN-integrated SPA provides network-layer connectivity to private applications, supporting both TCP-based and UDP-based protocols. This is valuable for enterprise applications that cannot operate through HTTP-only access proxies.

Option A is incorrect because the SD-WAN integration model does not require FortiClient to establish a direct ZTNA access-proxy tunnel to the on-premises FortiGate. Instead, FortiSASE security points of presence connect to the FortiGate SD-WAN hub through IPsec overlays.

Option B describes an endpoint-posture access-control capability, but posture evaluation is not inherently performed by the SD-WAN hub in this deployment method. FortiSASE and FortiClient can assess endpoint security conditions, while the SD-WAN hub primarily provides network connectivity and local security enforcement.

The principal advantages are protocol-flexible private application connectivity and centralized cloud security inspection, integrated with the existing SD-WAN architecture.

The spoke enables ' embed-measured-health ' in its health-check configuration, allowing SLA-related measurements or status to travel in the probe stream sent to the hub. On the hub, FortiOS supports remote SLA processing, notably ' set detect-mode remote ' , an appropriate ' sla-id-redistribute ' value, and a remote link-cost factor. The parameters ' priority-in-sla ' and ' priority-out-sla ' can control preference when the remote spoke reports a pass or fail state. Consequently, option A can be a useful configuration check if hub-to-spoke priority is not being applied. Option C, however, is not a universal requirement: the hub may consume the spoke ' s remote SLA status rather than independently testing identical performance criteria. The candidate option D gives ' set embedded-measure accept ' , which is not the documented FortiOS 7.6 remote health-check syntax. Option B is not necessary because hub and spoke member numbering need not match. The prior A,C answer is the closest available pair, but a fully verified two-answer key requires a more precise statement of the particular remote health-check mechanism. The official 7.6 Embedded SD-WAN SLA Status guide provides the authoritative hub-side CLI example.

Verification qualification: The hub-side remote-SLA feature requires detect-mode remote; the listed criteria are not universally mandated.

The session diagnostic displays an original session path and a reflect or auxiliary session for asymmetric forwarding. The reflect session lists dev=7- > 6/6- > 7; interface index 7 corresponds to port3 and index 6 corresponds to port2, establishing a reply direction of port2 to port3. The original session path dev=7- > 5/5- > 7 represents port3 and port1, not port3 and port2. Auxiliary sessions can be hardware-offloaded when the FortiGate network processor supports the relevant configuration and conditions; a single currently observed offload flag does not prove that capability is impossible. Therefore C and D are the correct conclusions. Reference: FortiOS 7.6 — Controlling Return Path with Auxiliary Session. An operational review should distinguish the rule that matches the traffic from the interface that is ultimately selected. Valid forwarding also depends on destination route eligibility, current member state and the applicable SLA or quality-selection algorithm. A diagnostic showing configured members alone is not conclusive evidence that all those members will carry a particular flow.

FortiSASE proxy-based secure internet access allows managed and unmanaged endpoints to use cloud-delivered security controls without requiring the FortiClient endpoint agent.

Option A is correct because a proxy auto-configuration file can define how browsers and operating systems redirect eligible HTTP and HTTPS requests to the FortiSASE secure web gateway.

A PAC file allows automatic proxy selection based on destination URLs, hostnames, and other conditions. FortiSASE supports hosted and downloadable PAC file configurations, simplifying deployment across large endpoint populations.

Option B is correct because endpoints should install and trust the FortiSASE certificate authority certificate when SSL deep inspection is required. During TLS inspection, FortiSASE decrypts permitted traffic for security analysis and presents certificates that must be trusted by the endpoint.

Without the appropriate certificate, browsers and applications may reject inspected HTTPS connections because the signing authority is untrusted.

Option C is incorrect because FortiClient is associated with agent-based endpoint connectivity. Proxy-based deployment can operate without installing FortiClient.

Option D is incorrect because a tunnel policy applies to tunnel-based traffic handling rather than constituting an endpoint onboarding component for explicit proxy access.

PAC configuration provides traffic steering, while CA certificate installation establishes the certificate trust needed for SSL inspection.