ACFE Updated CFE-Law Exam Questions and Answers by ernest

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 10.

In the context of Basic Principles of Evidence, specifically relating to privilege, the question asks about MOST ACCURATE.

The correct answer is B: Bob might have waived the privilege because he transmitted the protected information to a third party who has no need to know the information.

This question tests knowledge of evidence principles. The correct answer correctly distinguishes between types of evidence, admissibility requirements, or evidentiary privileges. Proper handling of evidence is crucial for successful fraud investigations and prosecutions.

This question tests your knowledge of Uncategorized.

the question asks about NOT.

The correct answer is D: The defendant made a false statement in a court of law..

This question tests your understanding of key fraud examination concepts and legal principles.

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.

In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, administrative, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.

The correct answer is A: License suspension.

This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.

Under the ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section, particularly The Civil Justice System and Individual Rights During Examinations , individuals have legally protected privacy interests that can give rise to civil liability when violated. One recognized invasion of privacy tort is intrusion upon seclusion, which occurs when someone intentionally intrudes, physically or otherwise, into another person’s private affairs without authorization and in a manner that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

In this scenario, Wilson searched Garcia’s private tablet without legitimate authority or investigative basis. Garcia had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her personal device, and there was no suspicion of wrongdoing to justify the intrusion. Because the wrongful act is the unauthorized access itself, Garcia would most likely assert a claim for intrusion into private matters.

Public disclosure of private facts requires dissemination of private information to third parties, which is not indicated here. Defamation requires a false statement communicated to others that harms reputation, which is also absent. Property damage would require physical harm to the tablet.

Therefore, the most appropriate civil claim is intrusion into an individual’s private matters, as the injury arises from the unauthorized invasion of Garcia’s privacy.