ACFE Updated CFE-Law Exam Questions and Answers by agatha

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.

In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, the question asks about LEAST ACCURATE, front businesses as a method of laundering money is the LEAST ACCURATE.

The correct answer is A: A red flag of a front business is the observation of a large number of customers during peak operating hours.

This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 4.

In the context of Securities Fraud, specifically relating to securities, unsuitable recommendations, the question asks about MOST ACCURATE, rules prohibiting securities broker-dealers from making unsuitable recommendations on investments or investment strategies.

The correct answer is D: A suitability violation occurs when a broker enters into transactions and manages a client ' s account for the purpose of generating excessive commissions.

This question tests knowledge of securities fraud and regulation. The correct answer accurately describes the role of regulatory bodies, securities laws, or fraud schemes in this context. Securities fraud is a specialized area requiring knowledge of specific regulations and oversight mechanisms.

This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.

In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.

The correct answer is B: False.

This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.

The correct answer is A. The CFE Manual explains that to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct, that the defendant acted intentionally or recklessly, and that the victim actually suffered emotional or mental distress as a result of the defendant’s conduct. These core elements match options B, C, and D.

There is no general requirement that the distress must have lasted for at least two years. That time-based condition is not one of the recognized elements listed in the CFE Law section. The Manual instead focuses on the nature of the conduct and the causal connection between that conduct and the victim’s injury. It also notes that the conduct must be sufficiently outrageous to exceed the bounds tolerated by civilized society and that mere insults or ordinary upset are not enough. Additionally, the Manual emphasizes that actionable claims require proof of serious, visible, and provable harm. Still, none of those requirements impose a fixed minimum duration such as two years. Accordingly, A is the only choice that is not a required element of this common law tort.