SAVE International Updated CVS Exam Questions and Answers by kira

The correct selections are A and C . A VM proposal title should be clear, concise, and persuasive because it is part of the communication package used to move a value alternative toward management understanding, acceptance, and implementation. In the Presentation Phase, the value team presents value alternatives to management, stakeholders, or decision makers, with the intent of helping them make informed decisions aligned with strategic objectives. The SAVE study guide identifies the Presentation Phase purpose as presenting value alternatives to management and other decision makers, and its outcome includes ensuring stakeholders understand the rationale of alternatives and generating interest to sanction implementation. ( cdn..com )

Therefore, a concise title helps the proposal communicate its central idea quickly without obscuring the function, benefit, or decision point. Framing the title to help sell the concept is also appropriate because a VM proposal must communicate value, not merely describe a technical change. The facilitator should avoid overly specific technical language when it narrows the audience’s understanding, and avoid general jargon because it weakens clarity, credibility, and decision usefulness. A strong title should express the value opportunity in management-facing terms.

References/topics: Presentation Phase; Development Phase; VM Proposal Communication; Value Alternatives; Management Decision Support.

The correct answers are C and D . A useful Work Breakdown Structure converts project or study information into a structured breakdown of the total scope. In VM program planning, this supports clearer control of deliverables, responsibilities, schedule logic, and implementation follow-up. The WBS is not simply a chronological activity list; it is a structured decomposition of the work into defined, manageable elements. This aligns with standard project-management guidance that describes the WBS as a hierarchical breakdown of project work into smaller components or work packages. ( Atlassian )

Option C is correct because identifying major milestones or high-level outputs and then decomposing them into manageable elements is a practical way to convert broad study information into usable work packages. Option D is also correct because breaking the project into defined elements is the core purpose of the WBS.

Option A is incorrect because chronological sequencing belongs more to scheduling, not WBS construction. Option B is incorrect because cost estimating may use the WBS later, but the WBS itself should be organized around scope, deliverables, and work elements rather than cost first. PMI also treats the WBS as a foundational project-control structure. ( Project Management Institute )

References/topics: VM Programs; Work Breakdown Structure; Implementation Planning; Project Scope Decomposition; Deliverable Control.

The correct answers are A. Review VM proposals and C. Rewrite VM proposals . During the Development Phase, selected ideas are converted into formal VM proposals with enough documentation for decision makers to determine whether implementation is justified. SAVE’s VM Standard Reference states that, in this phase, the VM study team develops selected ideas into VM proposals with sufficient documentation for implementation decisions.

The facilitator’s role is not to become the technical author or researcher for each proposal. Instead, the facilitator manages the process, maintains consistency, reviews proposal quality, checks clarity, confirms that required elements are included, and helps revise or rewrite proposal narratives so they are understandable, complete, and decision-ready. This aligns with the facilitator’s broader duty to lead the multidisciplinary VM process, keep the team disciplined within the Job Plan, and ensure outputs support value-based decisions. SAVE describes VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team led by a qualified VM facilitator.

Option B is incorrect because proposal preparation is primarily the responsibility of assigned team members or technical specialists. Option D is incorrect because background research is normally performed by the proposal owner or subject-matter experts, not by the facilitator as a primary role.

References/topics: Development Phase; VM Proposal Development; VM Facilitator Role; Proposal Review and Revision; VM Job Plan.

The correct answers are A and D . When decision-makers review VM study results but take no action, the facilitator is dealing with a change-response problem, not simply a technical presentation problem. In VM implementation guidance, this behavior aligns with the early “shock” response to change, where people may mentally shut down because the proposed change feels uncertain, risky, or disruptive. The recommended coping strategy is to create safety, structure, and visible support around the change.

Therefore, discussing allocation of time and resources is appropriate because implementation cannot move forward without clear commitment, staffing, schedule allowance, and management attention. The VM Guide identifies proper allocation of time and resources as a way to provide safety during change. It also states that shock and stress can be reduced by building a support network through a detailed implementation plan . ( pdfcoffee.com )

Option B is incorrect because the guidance emphasizes visible upper management support, not merely lower-level involvement. Option C is incorrect because limiting information increases uncertainty; the recommended approach is to provide broad, clear, and consistent information about the change.

References/topics: Implementation Phase; Change Management Strategies; Implementation Plan; Resource Allocation; Decision-Maker Engagement.