IFSE Institute Updated LLQP Exam Questions and Answers by alma

When an irrevocable beneficiary is designated, the policyholder must obtain the beneficiary's consent for any changes that affect the beneficiary’s rights, such as revoking their status or making policy alterations. By naming Ofra as an irrevocable beneficiary, Kaamil would be restricted from unilaterally changing this designation or withdrawing policy funds without her agreement​​. This requirement protects the irrevocable beneficiary’s interests, ensuring they retain certain rights in the policy.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:

TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)notes that life insurance policies include a suicide clause, typically denying benefits if suicide occurs within two years of the policy’s issue or a significant change (e.g., coverage increase). Jane’s original $100,000 policy was in force for over five years, beyond the two-year suicide exclusion. The increase to $300,000, approved one year before her suicide, restarts the exclusion for the additional $200,000. Thus, only the original $100,000—past its exclusion period—is payable. A (arbitrary limit) and C (full payout) misapply the clause, and D (no benefit) ignores the original coverage’s duration. B is correct.

Life insurance agents are generally required to deliver the insurance contract to the client within a “reasonable time” to ensure that the client is promptly informed of the policy’s terms andconditions. This standard is set to prevent undue delays that might affect the client's rights and their free look period. While no specific timeframe is always mandated, it is commonly understood within the LLQP guidelines that timely delivery is essential for compliance​​. Therefore, Olivier can reasonably wait until after his weekend to deliver the contract on Tuesday, as this would still fall within a reasonable time.

When a beneficiary is designated as irrevocable, the policyholder cannot make changes to the beneficiary designation or make other policy modifications that impact the irrevocable beneficiary’s rights without their consent. According to LLQP standards, an irrevocable beneficiary has a vested interest in the policy, and any alterations require their permission​​.

In this case, Surjit would need Rajbir’s consent to change or remove her as the beneficiary, regardless of their divorce. This stipulation upholds the binding nature of an irrevocable designation, ensuring that changes can only be made with the beneficiary’s agreement to protect their rights in the policy​​.