IFSE Institute Updated LLQP Exam Questions and Answers by philip

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Reinstatement of a lapsed whole life insurance policy is governed by the Civil Code of Quebec (Article 2428) and insurer policies outlined in the LLQP. If a policy lapses due to non-payment but has a cash value, it may remain in force temporarily via an automatic premium loan or reduced paid-up option. For reinstatement, the insured typically must provide evidence of insurability and repay overdue premiums, interest, and any cash value used, as Concilius offers. The LLQP specifies that reinstatement, if within the insurer’s allowable period (often 2–5 years), restores the policy to its original terms—same premium and coverage—unless otherwise stipulated. Option B, “with the same initial conditions,” aligns with this standard practice. Option A (new premium based on age) applies to new policies, not reinstatement. Option C (premium increase) or D (reduced amount) might occur if insurability declines, but Concilius meets the conditions, so no adjustment is required. The Ethics manual stresses transparency in explaining reinstatement terms.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), insurance representatives must report suspicious transactions to FINTRAC (Section 7). FINTRAC guidelines list red flags: urgency without justification, disinterest in product details, and cash payments, especially if inconsistent with client profile. Option C—clients in a hurry, uninterested in long-term benefits, and insisting on cash—matches these indicators, suggesting potential money laundering. Option A (questions about controls) may indicate curiosity or caution, not necessarily suspicion. Option B (hurry and cash) is less conclusive without disinterest in benefits. Option D (interest in benefits) contradicts typical laundering behavior. The Ethics manual requires vigilance against financial crime, supporting Véronique’s duty to report option C.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Gold’s role as a financial security advisor, per the Distribution Act (Section 16), requires him to act competently and in the client’s best interest. Tax advice, wills, and mandates in case of incapacity (Civil Code, Articles 2166–2174) often exceed an advisor’s expertise, necessitating referral to specialists like tax experts and notaries. By not proposing such collaboration, Gold risks providing incomplete or inaccurate advice, breaching his duty of care to the client (option B). Option A (the public) is too broad, as no public harm is evident. Option C (other professionals) is unaffected, as no direct duty to them is breached. Option D (the profession) could apply indirectly via reputational harm, but theprimary breach is to the client. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual mandates advisors to recognize their limits and refer clients appropriately.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under the Civil Code of Quebec (Article 2415), a policyholder (or subscriber) is the entity that owns and pays for an insurance or annuity contract, which can be an individual or a legal person like a corporation. Xtra, as a company, can use its retained earnings (unregistered capital) to fund an annuity contract and be designated as the policyholder, making option D correct. Option A is false, as legal persons can own contracts (e.g., group insurance). Option B’s requirement of a registered plan is incorrect—annuities can be funded with non-registered funds. Option C introduces a “subrogated annuitant,” a misnomer here, as the annuitant is the person receiving payments, not a decision-maker, and no such requirement exists. The LLQP and Ethics manual confirm that corporations can be policyholders for business purposes, like key person coverage or investments.