ISA Updated ISA-IEC-62443 Exam Questions and Answers by florrie

Packet filter firewalls, as defined by ISA/IEC 62443 standards on cybersecurity, primarily examine the source, destination, and ports in the header of each packet. This type of firewall does not inspect the packet content deeply (such as its structure or sequence) or maintain awareness of the relationships between packets in a session. Instead, it operates at a more superficial level, filtering packets based solely on IP addresses and TCP/UDP ports. This approach allows packet filter firewalls to quickly process and either accept or block packets based on these predefined criteria without delving into the complexities of session management or the content of the packets up to the application layer.

Separation of duties is a security principle that aims to prevent fraud, errors, conflicts of interest, or misuse of resources by dividing critical tasks or functions among different people or teams. It is one of the foundational requirements (FRs) of the ISA/IEC 62443 standards for securing industrial automation and control systems (IACSs). According to the ISA/IEC 62443-2-1 standard, separation of duties includes the following system requirements (SRs):

SR 2.1: Security management policy

SR 2.2: Personnel security

SR 2.3: System development and maintenance

SR 2.4: Incident response and recovery

SR 2.5: Compliance and review

Among these SRs, the one that is most related to the example of system development and maintenance is SR 2.3. SR 2.3 requires that the IACS shall provide the capability to ensure that the development and maintenance of the system and its components are performed in a secure manner. This means that the IACS should have a mechanism to control the access and authorization of developers, testers, integrators, and maintainers who work on the system and its components. It also means that the IACS should have a mechanism to verify and validate the quality and security of the system and its components before, during, and after the development and maintenance processes.

Therefore, an example of separation of duties as a part of system development and maintenance is that changes are approved by one party and implemented by another. This ensures that the changes are authorized, documented, and reviewed by someone who is not involved in the implementation. This reduces the risk of introducing errors, vulnerabilities, or malicious code into the system and its components.

An asymmetric key is a feature of asymmetric cryptography, also known as public-key cryptography, which is a method of encrypting and decrypting data using two different keys: a public key and a private key. The public key can be shared with anyone, while the private key must be kept secret by the owner. The public key and the private key are mathematically related, but it is computationally infeasible to derive one from the other. Asymmetric cryptography can be used for various purposes, such as digital signatures, key exchange, and encryption. For example, if Alice wants to send a message to Bob, she can use Bob’s public key to encrypt the message, and only Bob can decrypt it using his private key. Alternatively, if Bob wants to prove that he is the author of a message, he can use his private key to sign the message, and anyone can verify it using his public key. Asymmetric cryptography has some advantages over symmetric cryptography, which uses the same key for both encryption and decryption. For instance, asymmetric cryptography does not require a secure channel to distribute the keys, and it can provide non-repudiation and authentication. However, asymmetric cryptography also has some drawbacks, such as higher computational complexity, larger key sizes, and higher network overhead.

Security zones are logical groupings of assets that share common security requirements based on factors such as criticality, consequence, vulnerability, and threat. Security zones are used to apply the principle of defense in depth, which means creating multiple layers of protection to prevent or mitigate cyberattacks. By creating security zones, asset owners can isolate the most critical or sensitive assets from the less critical or sensitive ones, and apply different levels of security controls to each zone according to the risk assessment. Security zones are not necessarily aligned with physical network segments, as assets within the same network may have different security requirements. For example, a network segment may contain both a safety instrumented system (SIS) and a human-machine interface (HMI), but the SIS has a higher security requirement than the HMI. Therefore, the SIS and the HMI should be in different security zones, even if they are in the same network segment. Similarly, assets within the same logical communication network may not have the same security requirements, and therefore should not be in the same security zone. For example, a logical communication network may span across multiple physical locations, such as a plant and a corporate office, but the assets in the plant may have higher security requirements than the assets in the office. Therefore, the assets in the plant and the office should be in different security zones, even if they are in the same logical communication network. Finally, all components in a large or complex system should not be in the same security zone, as this would create a single point of failure and expose the entire system to potential cyberattacks. Instead, the components should be divided into smaller and simpler security zones, based on their security requirements, and the communication between the zones should be controlled by conduits. Conduits are logical or physical connections between security zones that allow data flow and access control. Conduits should be designed to minimize the attack surface and the potential impact of cyberattacks, by applying security controls such as firewalls, encryption, authentication, and authorization. References:

How to Define Zones and Conduits1

Securing industrial networks: What is ISA/IEC 62443?2

ISA/IEC 62443 Series of Standards3