CIPS Updated L4M6 Exam Questions and Answers by arlo-james

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The buying organisation's decision to terminate the partnership with supplier FGH is influenced by:

Changes in the composition of the supply market: The entry of new suppliers into the market provides the buying organisation with more options, reducing dependency on FGH and enabling the pursuit of better partnerships.

Poor communication by the supplier: FGH's lack of proactive communication regarding delivery delays has led to frustration, indicating a breakdown in the partnership's effectiveness.

These factors align with the principles of supplier relationship management, where effective communication and adaptability to market changes are crucial.

An amicable termination approach focuses on maintaining goodwill and professionalism when ending a contract. According to CIPS guidance, it is most appropriate in situations where:

The pool of alternative suppliers is small (1): Maintaining good relations is important to preserve future sourcing options. Burning bridges could reduce available suppliers in the future.

The buyer must continue working with the supplier during the notice/termination period (2): An amicable approach ensures cooperation during transition and avoids disruption to operations.

By contrast:

Arm’s-length relationships (3) are transactional and generally require less concern about relationship preservation.

Material breaches (4) usually justify a firmer legal termination approach, rather than amicable negotiation.

Thus, the correct circumstances for an amicable style termination are 1 and 2.

Explanation

The correct answers are; The marketplace has become more volatile, Working together will create synergies and The need to improve performance to satisfy the end customer. Further Drivers ofPartnership Sourcing can be found on p.127. The other answers are incorrect as entering a partnership won’t protect intellectual property rights- in fact that’s one of the big risks of entering into a partnership. Partnerships won’t increase costs and lead-times, they’re likely to decrease them.

Obtaining multiple quotations ensures value for money by comparing suppliers based on cost, quality, and other criteria. It promotes competitive pricing and informed decision-making.