APICS Updated CPIM-Part-2 Exam Questions and Answers by franky

Mixed-model scheduling is a production technique that allows for the simultaneous production of different products or features on the same production line or system. Mixed-model scheduling can help reduce lead times, inventory levels, setup times, and material shortages by increasing the flexibility and responsiveness of the production process. One of the benefits of mixed-model scheduling is improved demand response, which means the ability to meet customer demand without delay or stockout. Improved demand response can enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty, as well as reduce the need for safety stock or buffer inventory. By using mixed-model scheduling, a company can produce products or features according to the actual or forecasted customer demand, rather than producing large batches of standardized products or features. This can help avoid overproduction or underproduction, which can result in excess inventory or lost sales. Mixed-model scheduling can also help adjust the production output quickly and easily when there are changes or fluctuations in demand, by using flexible automation, lean production techniques, or quick response methods.

The other options are not benefits of mixed-model scheduling. Increased inventory is not a benefit of mixed-model scheduling, but rather a drawback. Increased inventory can increase inventory costs, such as holding costs, transportation costs, or obsolescence costs. It can also reduce inventory visibility and control, as well as increase the risk of quality issues or spoilage. Mixed-model scheduling can help reduce inventory by producing products or features in small batches or single units that match customer demand. Fewer setups are not a benefit of mixed-model scheduling, but rather a requirement. Fewer setups mean less time and resources spent on changing or adjusting the production system to produce different products or features. Fewer setups can increase the efficiency and productivity of the production process, as well as reduce the setup costs and waste. Mixed-model scheduling requires fewer setups to enable the simultaneous production of different products or features on the same production line or system. Fewer material shortages are not a benefit of mixed-model scheduling, but rather an outcome. Fewer material shortages mean less disruption or delay in the production process due to the lack of materials or components needed for production. Fewer material shortages can improve the quality and reliability of the production process, as well as reduce the material costs and waste. Mixed-model scheduling can result in fewermaterial shortages by reducing the lead times and inventory levels of materials or components, as well as by improving the communication and coordination with suppliers.

References := Mixed Model Scheduling - Mountain Home Academy, Reduce Lot Sizes, Mixed Model Scheduling - Academic library, Introduction To Mixed Model Production …{Strategos}

A capacity-leading strategy is a proactive approach that adds or subtracts capacity in anticipation of future market demand. It is an aggressive strategy with the objective of improving the service level and decreasing lead time1. An advantage of adopting a capacity-leading strategy is that there issufficient capacity to meet demand, which means that the organization can satisfy customer needs and expectations, as well as capture new market opportunities. A capacity-leading strategy can also help the organization gain a competitive edge by being the first to offer new products or services, or by lowering prices due to economies of scale2.

The other options are not advantages of adopting a capacity-leading strategy. There is not necessarily sufficient demand to consume capacity, which means that the organization may face overcapacity problems, such as high inventory costs, low utilization rates, and reduced profitability3. All demand is not satisfied, and profit is not maximized, because there may be other factors that affect customer satisfaction and profitability, such as quality, price, or service4. Overcapacity problems are not minimized, but rather increased, by adopting a capacity-leading strategy, because the organization may have more capacity than needed if demand does not increase as expected3.

References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Domain 4: Plan and Manage Supply, Section 4.1: Supply Management Concepts and Tools, p. 33-34; Capacity Planning Strategies: Types, Examples, Pros And Cons - Toggl; Lead Capacity Strategy, Lead Demand Strategy - UniversalTeacher.com; Capacity Planning Strategies For End-to-End Supply Chain Profitability; Capacity Planning Strategies: Types, Examples, Pros And Cons - Toggl.

Compared to traditional supplier relationships, a more strategic view of supplier relationships would require maintaining communication based on trust. Trust is a key factor that enables effective collaboration, information sharing, problem solving, and innovation between supply chain partners12. Trust can also reduce transaction costs, conflicts, and opportunism, and increase commitment, loyalty, and performance34. Therefore, maintaining communication based on trust is essential for developing and sustaining strategic supplier relationships that can create value and competitive advantage for both parties.

The other options are not necessarily required for a more strategic view of supplier relationships, because they are either insufficient or irrelevant. Offering the supplier more business may increase the volume or frequency of transactions, but it does not guarantee a more strategic or long-term relationship. Adopting electronic data interchange (EDI) may improve the efficiency or accuracy of information exchange, but it does not ensure a more collaborative or innovative relationship. Implementing concurrent engineering may enhance the product design or development process, but it does not address the other aspects of a strategic relationship, such as quality, delivery, or risk management.

Fill rate is the percentage of customer orders that are fulfilled without running out of inventory or placing backorders1. Fill rate is an important measure of customer service and inventory management efficiency. A high fill rate indicates that the company can meet customer demand in a timely and accurate manner, while a low fill rate suggests that the company is struggling to satisfy customer expectations.

Operating costs are the expenses associated with running a business, such as rent, utilities, wages, transportation, etc2. Operating costs are influenced by various factors, such as production volume, inventory level, technology, and quality. A high operating cost means that the company spends more money to produce and deliver its products or services, while a low operating cost means that the company spends less money to do so.

Service level is the measure of how well a company delivers its products or services to its customers, based on criteria such as availability, timeliness, quality, and satisfaction3. Service level is affected by various factors, such as demand variability, supply reliability, capacity utilization, and customer feedback. A high service level means that the company meets or exceeds customer expectations, while a low service level means that the company fails or falls short of customer expectations.

As the company continues its initiative to increase the fill rate on these parts to 100%, it is most likely that operating costs will increase faster than service level. This is because increasing the fill rate requires increasing the inventory level, which in turn increases the carrying costs, such as warehousing, insurance, taxes, and obsolescence4. Moreover, increasing the fill rate also requires reducing the variability and uncertainty in demand and supply, which may involve investing in more advanced technology, improving quality control, enhancing supplier relationships, or implementing demand management techniques5. These actions can also increase the operating costs of the company.

However, increasing the fill rate does not necessarily increase the service level at the same rate. This is because service level depends not only on fill rate, but also on other factors, such as delivery speed, order accuracy, product quality, and customer satisfaction6. Therefore, increasing the fill rate may not be enough to improve the service level significantly. In fact, there may be a point of diminishing returns, where increasing the fill rate beyond a certain level does not result in a proportional increase in service level. For example, increasing the fill rate from 95% to 99% may have a noticeable impact on service level, but increasing it from 99% to 100% may have a negligible impact on service level.