SOCRA Updated CCRP Exam Questions and Answers by tomi

Informed consent is a fundamental ethical requirement. If it is violated in a device trial, the FDA requires rapid reporting.

21 CFR 812.150(b)(5):States that a sponsor shall submit to FDA “any report of use of a device without obtaining informed consent, within5 working daysafter the sponsor first receives notice of such use.”

This expedited reporting ensures FDA oversight of serious violations and protection of human subjects.

Incorrect options:

A (1 day) is overly strict and not codified.

C (10 days) and D (30 days) are too delayed to meet regulatory intent of immediate oversight.

Thus, the correct timeline iswithin 5 working days.

Investigators must provideevidence of qualificationsto conduct the study.

ICH E6(R2) 4.1.1:“The investigator should be qualified by education, training, and experience to assume responsibility for the proper conduct of the trial.”

ICH E6(R2) 8.2.10:Essential documents include thecurriculum vitae (CV)or other documents evidencing investigator qualifications, submitted to both sponsor and IRB/IEC.

Proof of citizenship (A) and letters of recommendation (B) are irrelevant. A copy of a medical license (D) may be provided but isnot specifically requiredby ICH. The CV is the universally required document.

Thus, the correct answer isC (Curriculum vitae).

When reviewing protocols, IRBs/IECs are primarily responsible forsafeguarding human subjectsby evaluating risks, benefits, and fairness in subject selection.

21 CFR 56.111(a)(3):“In making its determination the IRB shall determine that… selection of subjects is equitable.”

45 CFR 46.111(a)(3):Repeats this requirement, emphasizing fairness across gender, race, age, and socioeconomic status.

Other options:

Patient population availability (A) is afeasibility issue, addressed by investigators and sponsors, not IRBs.

Education of the study team (C) is confirmed by thesponsor and investigator, not IRB.

Funding sources (D) may raise conflict of interest concerns, but they are not IRB approval criteria per federal regulations.

Thus, IRBs focus onjustice and fairness in subject selectionas part of the Belmont Report principles.

This question tests drug accountability and dosing calculation, which is central to ICH E6(R2) 4.6 (Investigational product management). Subjects must receive the correct supply and any discrepancy must be reconciled.

The prescribed regimen is 2 mg twice daily = 4 mg per day. With 1 mg tablets, this equals 4 tablets daily. Over 10 days, the subject should consume 40 tablets (4 × 10 = 40). Since 45 tablets were dispensed, the subject should have 5 tablets remaining after 10 days.

Accurate accountability ensures trial integrity and subject safety. Investigators are responsible for maintaining investigational product (IP) records, including dispensing, usage, and returns. According to ICH:

4.6.3: “The investigator/institution should maintain records of the product’s delivery to the trial site, the inventory, the use by each subject, and the return to the sponsor or alternative disposition.”

4.6.5: “The investigator should ensure that investigational products are used only in accordance with the approved protocol.”

Thus, the correct answer is C (5 tablets remain). This reflects proper dosing compliance and highlights the importance of meticulous IP tracking in clinical trials.