SAP Updated C_OCM_2503 Exam Questions and Answers by keyaan

Low readiness in a business unit (assessed pre-go-live, likely in Deploy) requires targeted intervention. Option B is correct because a workshop with project management (for alignment), local management (for context), and change agents (for execution) enables a deep dive into root causes and collaborative mitigation planning (e.g., extra training). This multi-stakeholder approach ensures comprehensive understanding and action. Option A is too narrow—change agents alone lack the authority or full perspective. Option C excludes local input, limiting effectiveness. Option D involves the sponsor, which is overkill for an operational issue, and users may not strategize solutions. SAP OCM favors inclusive, practical responses.

“Address low readiness through workshops with project management, local leaders, and change agents to analyze results and plan targeted mitigation” (SAP Activate, Business Readiness Assessment Follow-Up).

Effective communication in SAP OCM leverages a mix of channels. Option A is correct because existing channels (e.g., company intranet) save resources, while new channels (e.g., project-specific newsletters) highlight critical updates, grabbing attention. Option B is incorrect—channel choice isn’t age-specific, and “generic information” isn’t a key benefit. Option C is flawed; existing channels don’t inherently signal stability, and new channels don’t prevent overload. Option D is incorrect—internalization speed and alignment effort aren’t primary benefits tied to channel type.SAP OCM advocates balancing efficiency and impact, making A the best fit.

“Utilize existing channels to minimize effort and cost, and introduce new channels to emphasize key messages and enhance visibility” (SAP OCM Framework, Communication Dimension).

Supporters in SAP OCM stakeholder analysis (e.g., enthusiastic managers) are assets to leverage. Option C is correct because assigning project roles (e.g., change agent) amplifies their influence—e.g., a supportive lead driving adoption in their unit boosts success. Option D is correct as their positive attitude can sway others—e.g., a supporter sharing benefits in a meeting shifts skeptics’ views organically.

Option A is incorrect—pressuring skeptics risks backlash; influence should be subtle, not coercive. Option B is incorrect; design decisions (e.g., process flows) are for experts, not supporters’ primary role, which is advocacy. SAP OCM maximizes supporters’ enthusiasm strategically.

“Leverage supporters by assigning roles to enhance their impact and using their positivity to influence others effectively” (SAP Activate, Stakeholder Management Strategies).

The change manager in SAP OCM must set boundaries to avoid being the sole “people fixer.” Option A is correct—describing OCM as a “long-distance endeavor” with joint effort clarifies it’s an ongoing, collective process (e.g., spanning Prepare to Run), not a solo fix-it role. For instance, adoption issues in Run require sustained teamwork, not just the change manager’s intervention. Option B is correct because calling it a “team sport” emphasizes that the project team—PM, IT, business—shares responsibility (e.g., PM schedules, IT supports, OCM guides), preventing the change manager from being overburdened. Option D is correct as framing OCM as a “core leadership task” highlights that business leaders must drive buy-in (e.g., a VP addressing resistance), not just delegate to the change manager.

Option C is incorrect—OCM isn’t a project management task; it’s a distinct discipline collaborating with PM, not subsumed under it. Option E is incorrect; a “checkbox approach” misrepresents OCM’s dynamic, adaptive nature—strict procedures don’t fit SAP’s agile methodology. SAP OCM stresses shared ownership to manage expectations.

“Clarify that change management is a continuous, team-based effort requiring leadership support, not a solitary or rigid task, to define its scope accurately” (SAP OCM Framework, Change Manager Role Clarification).