Salesforce Updated JavaScript-Developer-I Exam Questions and Answers by mattias

The correct answer is C .

The original option contains a typing error. It should use the existing variable name:

let numberValue = Number(strNumber);

The value of strNumber is a string:

' 12345 '

Using Number() converts the numeric string into a JavaScript number:

12345

So after execution:

typeof numberValue;

returns:

" number "

Professional review of each option:

Option

Result

Explanation

A

Incorrect

JavaScript does not have a standard global Integer() conversion function.

B

Incorrect

Strings do not have a standard .toInteger() method.

C

Correct

Number(strNumber) correctly converts ' 12345 ' into 12345.

D

Incorrect

This is not valid JavaScript casting syntax.

A commonly used alternative would also be:

let numberValue = parseInt(strNumber, 10);

But from the provided answer choices, the verified answer is C .

Currently:

sayHello expects a value name and prints it.

world is a function that returns ' World ' .

sayHello(world); passes the function object itself, not the result of calling it.

So name inside sayHello is a function, not the string " World " .

To keep the call sayHello(world) yet get " World " , sayHello must call the function parameter:

const sayHello = (name) = > {

console.log( ' Hello ' , name());

};

Now:

sayHello(world) passes the function.

Inside sayHello, name() calls world(), which returns " World " .

The console logs " Hello World " .

Why the others are wrong:

B: Changing line 7 to }(); would attempt to IIFE the function definition and break the declaration.

C: sayHello(world)() would try to call the return value of sayHello, which is undefined, causing an error.

D: Changing world to a function declaration does not change the fact that it is passed as a function reference; sayHello still prints the function object, not ' World ' .

We have an array of plain objects:

[

{ name: ' John ' , email: ' john@email.com ' },

{ name: ' Jane ' , email: ' jane@email.com ' },

{ name: ' Emily ' , email: ' emily@email.com ' }

]

We want:

A “visual representation” of the list.

Ability to sort by name or email in DevTools.

console.table:

console.table(data) renders data as a table in most browser devtools and Node consoles that support it.

Each object becomes a row; properties (name, email) become columns.

Many DevTools UIs allow:

Clicking column headers to sort by that column.

Filtering / viewing in a structured way.

So:

console.table(usersList);

Displays a sortable table of users by name or email. This matches the requirement exactly.

Other options:

console.group(usersList);

Starts a console group. The argument is just logged as a line label.

It does not create a table or sortable view; it just groups subsequent logs.

console.groupCollapsed(usersList);

Same grouping behavior, but collapsed by default.

Again, no table or sortable columns.

console.info(usersList);

Logs the array in the console, but as a standard log/info.

You can expand objects, but there is no table view or built-in column sorting.

Therefore, the correct method is:

Answer: A

Study Guide / Concept References (no links):

console.table for tabular logging

console.group and console.groupCollapsed for grouped logs

console.log / console.info standard logging behavior

DevTools UI support for sorting columns in console.table

Inside setCurrentUrl, url is assigned without var, let, or const :

url = window.location.href;

In non–strict mode, this implicitly creates a global variable url on window.

Execution order:

setCurrentUrl(); creates/sets global url to window.location.href.

console.log( " The current URL is: " + url); has access to url in global scope and prints correctly.

Thus:

url has global scope.

Line 02 runs without error and logs a valid string.

So B is correct.