OMG Updated OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam Questions and Answers by lucca

In UML, a Dependency is a relationship that signifies that one NamedElement, the client, depends on another NamedElement, the supplier, meaning that a change in the supplier could affect the client. If NamedElement A is the supplier and NamedElement B is the client in a Dependency relationship, and there is a Comment indicating that both participate in a transformation, the interpretation is that B (the client) depends on A (the supplier) for that transformation. The comment does not necessarily change the nature of the Dependency relationship; it simply adds additional information about the nature of their interaction. A transformation could mean that B transforms A's supplied element in some way, but in terms of UML Dependency relationships,it would still be interpreted as "A depends on B" or "B requires A for its transformation". This interpretation aligns with the UML 2.x Infrastructure and Superstructure specifications, which explain Dependencies and their meanings within the UML metamodel.

In UML, the «bind» relationship is used to specify that a class is a template instantiation of a template class, where actual parameters are bound to the formal parameters of the template class1. However, in the case of the relationship between a concrete class like Vector and an abstract class like AbstractList, the correct relationship should be Generalization, not «bind».

Generalization is a taxonomic relationship between a more general classifier and a more specific classifier. Each instance of the specific classifier is also an instance of the general classifier1. Thus, Vector being a concrete implementation of AbstractList, should inherit from AbstractList, which is correctly represented by a Generalization relationship in UML.

The other options can be evaluated as follows:

• Option A: The upper limit for the size of PhontyQueue is a design decision that should be based on the requirements and use cases of the application. It is not inherently incorrect in UML to have a specific upper limit.
• Option C: The Generalization relationship is correctly used between PriorityQueue and AbstractQueue as it represents inheritance in UML.
• Option D: While it is true that template parameters are typically defined at the top of the hierarchy, the statement is too absolute. In UML, template parameters can be added to specialized classes, but it depends on the specific design and requirements. Therefore, without additional context, this statement cannot be deemed universally valid.

In conclusion, the most applicable and valid review comment is option B, which correctly identifies the misuse of the «bind» relationship in the context of the class diagram provided.

In UML, an InformationItem represents an abstraction of all those elements in a UML model that have an information-bearing feature. It is depicted as a classifier with the keyword «informationItem». An InformationItem does not have direct instances and serves as a mechanism to handle unspecified, untyped information in a model. In the context of a commercial transaction model, currencies such as euros, pesos, and dollars can be abstractly represented as InformationItems to signify that they are used as a form of data exchange but without specifying the concrete structure or data type. Figure 2 correctly uses InformationItem notation, with the «informationItem» keyword and the directed association pointing from the Currency InformationItem to the Euro, Peso, and Dollar, which are likely representations or manifestations of the Currency. This complies with the UML specification for representing abstract entities in models that are involved in the exchange or flow of information.

The correct representation of a binding of the template operationaddElement<E>withEbeing bound to the typeCardisaddElement (e : Card). This notation means that the template parameterEis being replaced by the concrete typeCard, thus instantiating the template operation with that specific type. In UML, this instantiation does not require the«bind»keyword or the template brackets<>around the type in the operation signature itself; it is simply represented by using the concrete type as the type of the parameter in the operation. Thisusage is consistent with the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which explains how operations of a template classifier are instantiated when template parameters are bound to actual types.