IIBA Updated ECBA Exam Questions and Answers by samir

 The level of abstraction is one of the key elements in the task of planning business analysis information management. It refers to the degree of detail or generality at which the business analysis information is captured and managed. Deciding on the appropriate level of abstraction is crucial as it affects how information is understood, communicated, and used by stakeholders.

References: This element is part of the guidance provided for business analysis planning and monitoring, which includes organizing business analysis information and planning for requirement reuse, storage, and access, as well as requirements attributes1.

The BABOK® Guide emphasizes the importance of collaboration when inconsistencies are found between elicitation results. It suggests that business analysts should work together with stakeholders to resolve variations identified in the results. This collaborative approach is essential for ensuring that the information is consistent and accurately represented, and it helps to uncover any discrepancies or ambiguities early in the process, which can prevent costly errors or delays later on.

References: The information is based on the guidelines provided in the BABOK® Guide, which outlines the best practices for confirming elicitation results and resolving inconsistencies through collaboration123.

Business Analysts (BAs) commonly use a checklist during requirements verification to ensure that all requirements are consistent, complete, coherent, and testable. This checklist typically includes a standard set of quality elements that the requirements must adhere to. The use of a checklist helps BAs to systematically verify each requirement against these quality criteria. References: The BABOK Guide lists 8 characteristics of requirements quality: cohesive, complete, consistent, correct, feasible, modifiable, unambiguous, and testable. These characteristics form the basis of the standard quality elements included in a verification checklist1.

A requirement can be of benefit to a stakeholder and still not be a desirable part of a solution. A requirement that does not deliver benefit to a stakeholder is a strong candidate for elimination. When requirements do not align, either the future state must be re-evaluated and the solution scope changed, or the requirement removed from the solution scope.