HP Updated HPE7-A03 Exam Questions and Answers by marlow

Capacity based design with low to mid density - Basic office/cubicle area with low to medium user density and no voice with limited rf redundancy.

Coverage based design - Coverage, office areas with higher user density OR basic coverage office/cubicle with High Demand users

High-capacity design - High user density indoor space, with high demand users

Very low-density, low coverage - Warehouses, large open areas

The types of wireless network deployment should be matched to the usage scenarios based on the density of users and coverage requirements:

Capacity based design with low to mid density is suitable for basic office or cubicle areas where there are not many users, and high-performance voice applications are not a priority, thus limited RF redundancy may be acceptable.

Coverage based design is intended for areas where coverage is more critical than capacity. It could be used in office areas with higher user density, where maintaining a basic level of connectivity is more important than accommodating a large number of high-bandwidth connections.

High-capacity design is used in environments where there is a high density of users who are likely to be using bandwidth-intensive applications. This could include indoor spaces like conference centers, auditoriums, or any area with a high concentration of users and devices.

Very low-density, low coverage is typically for spaces like warehouses or large open areas where there are few users spread out over a large area. The focus here is on providing coverage to all areas, regardless of the low user density.

For an Executive Summary, typically the following items should be included:

Brief Summary

Contact Information

High-Level Design

Purpose of the Document

Recommendations

Scope

Target Audience

A 2-tier campus LAN architecture, consisting of the core and access layers, is typically suitable for smaller campuses or networks with limited numbers of wiring closets. This simplified architecture eliminates the need for a dedicated aggregation layer, which is more common in larger, more complex network environments (the 3-tier architecture). In a small campus setting with only a few wiring closets, a 2-tier design can provide sufficient performance and scalability, reducing complexity and potentially lowering costs. This architecture allows for direct connectivity between the access layer, where end devices connect to the network, and the core layer, which routes traffic to and from the campus network. The use of a 2-tier architecture in such scenarios is driven by the network's size and the simplicity of its requirements, making it an efficient and effective choice.