CIPS Updated L4M1 Exam Questions and Answers by frazer

- Firstly start with a definition of Corporate Governance – this means the rules, policies, processes and organisational structures that ensure an organisation adheres to accepted ethical standards, good practices, the law and regulations. It’s the systems put in place which directs and controls organisations to do ‘the right thing’.

- Then move on to discuss why having this is important – I’d maybe think of 3-4 examples here such as: protects the interest of shareholders, reduces risk, moral obligations, legal obligations

- The last part of your essay should talk about the 2 obstacles – describe two from the following list: lack of executive support, poor stakeholder co-operation, lack of clarity and / or resources, having poor IT systems, lack of co-ordination of procurement responsibilities. Because you’re only talking about 2 here, you’ll need to go into detail about them. So pick 2 you know well. Don’t be tempted to talk about more than 2. You won’t get extra marks.

Example Essay:

Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, processes, and structures by which a company is directed and controlled. It encompasses the relationships among a company's management, its board of directors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. The primary objective of corporate governance is to ensure that the company operates in an ethical, transparent, and accountable manner, safeguarding the interests of shareholders and promoting long-term value creation. Corporate governance can be defined internally (by shareholders/ managers) or externally (by governments and international standard-setting bodies such as ISO) and is important for all organisations

Corporate governance is needed because you can’t assume everyone will act ethically- rules and procedures need to be written down and the organisation needs to have recourse for dealing with behaviour that falls outside of what is accepted. Procurement’s role in Corporate Governance includes control over finance and expenditure, ensuring the supply chain is ‘clean’ (i.e. not involved in unethical business practices such as child labour) and risk management.

Why having a corporate governance structure is important:

1) The procurement department has a ‘stewardship’ role – it controls large sums of organisation’s funds. There are many opportunities to commit fraud, make unethical or biased decisions so it’s important that there are corporate governance structures in place to prevent this. It protects the organisation from individuals with bad intent, scandal, and legal repercussions.

2) Strong Corporate Governance is required to successfully manage a supply chain. It’s important to ensure good relationships- suppliers need to see you as a ‘good customer’. If your organisation is seen to be unethical or underhand, suppliers may not want to work with you.

3) Financial impact – where corporate governance isn’t implemented, there may be financial costs for the organisation. For example, in the Public Sector if a supplier successfully challenges a tender award, the buyer may have to award the value of the tender – so there’s financial impact on a company if corporate governance isn’t followed.

Obstacle 1 – lack of senior management support

Unless there is buy-in from the senior leadership team it will not be possible for departments such as Procurement to implement sound Corporate Governance procedures. Corporate Governance needs to be directed from the top of an organisation to ensure all departments and staff give importance to this. If Senior Leadership are seen not to care about implementing or following Corporate Governance, other staff won’t care either. They need to lead by example to ensure the whole organisation ‘buys into’ the processes.

Obstacle 2 – Poor IT infrastructure.

For Corporate Governance to be effective, an effective IT system must be implemented. For example, to avoid fraud it’s not just necessary to have a written anti-fraud policy, there must be ways of checking that fraud isn’t being committed. The way to do this is to have an effective IT system which can flag anomaly payments and procurement activities outside of what is considered ‘normal’. Therefore, having a poor IT infrastructure is a barrier to effective Corporate Governance.

In conclusion, corporate governance is essential for building trust among stakeholders and contributing to the overall success and sustainability of a company. Effective governance structures and practices instil confidence in investors, enhance the company's reputation, and foster a culture of responsibility and accountability throughout the organization. Good corporate governance is a cornerstone of sound business management and contributes to the long-term prosperity of the company.

Tutor Notes

- Corporate Governance became a big thing in the 70s and 80s following high profile scandals and the collapse of several companies. Investors were concerned about what companies were doing which led to increased control on the powers of directors and greater transparency of corporate actions.

- Examples of Corporate Governance. Enron is a good real life example you could use: Impact of Bad Corporate Governance - Corporate Fraud and Corruption: A Holistic Approach to Preventing Financial Crises (ebrary.net)

- This is a really good real-life example of Public Sector procurement gone wrong: Flawed nuclear tender sees £100m payout to firms - BBC News

- Adding in some real life examples will take your essay from a Merit result (50-70%) to a Distinction (70% +)

- Another way this topic can come up as a question is describing the elements of corporate governance, or asking what a procurement manager should do when corporate governance is broken/ not followed.

- LO 3.1 p.117

- Mention of some of the following benefits with at least one example provided against each; cost savings, time savings, more efficient, higher levels of transparency, easier to access historical records to inform upon decision making, mitigates risks such as fraudulent spending, easier to track spend against budgets, ensures compliance with regulations, provides ‘real-time’ information, paperless communications (so more environmentally friendly), assists in Supply Chain Management and integration with supply partners.

- I’d suggest 5 is a good amount to aim for

Example Essay

Procurement stands to gain numerous benefits from the adoption of electronic systems. These electronic tools and systems bring efficiency, accuracy, transparency, and cost-effectiveness to the procurement process. Here are several compelling reasons why procurement should leverage electronic systems:

Cost savings – the use of electronic tools saves organisations money. Although there is an initial cost outlay, over time the systems will save the organisation money. For example the use of e-procurement tools can save money by accessing a wider pool of suppliers. For example, when using an e-sourcing portal, a tender may reach a larger number of suppliers- this makes the tender more competitive thus driving down prices. Compared to traditional methods such as phoning suppliers for prices, the use of electronic portals encourages suppliers to ‘sharpen their pencils’ and provide the best prices in order to win work. Money is also saved as communication is digital (so there is no costs for paper and postage).

Time savings – electronic tools automate a lot of processes which saves time. An example of this is e-requisitioning tools where orders can be placed automatically by a piece oftechnology when quantities of a material reach a certain level. For example, in a cake manufacturing organisation they may use an MRP system which calculates how many eggs are required per day. The machine knows that when the company only have 50 eggs left, a new order needs to be issued to the supplier. The MRP system (e-requisitioning system) therefore saves time as the Procurement department doesn’t have to manually pick up the phone to place the order with the supplier- it is done automatically.

Access to higher levels of information - e-Procurement gives you centralised access to all your data. You can access the system to look at historical purchases with ease compared to having to dig through folders and filing cabinets. For example, an electronic PO system will hold details of all historical POs, this means if someone has a question about a PO that was raised 4 months ago, finding the information is much easier and quicker. Some systems may also be able to provide analytical data such as changes to spend over time, or which suppliers a buyer spends the most money with. This higher level of information can help inform upon future decision making. For example, if the organisation wishes to consolidate its supplier base it would look through historical data provided by the electronic system to find out which suppliers are used the least and remove these from the ‘pre-approved supplier list’. This level of data might not be available in manual systems.

Better budget tracking – using electronic systems allows for real-time information to be collected which allows Procurement Managers to see where spend is compared to forecasts and budgets. An example of this is in the use of Pre-Payment Cards – rather than giving staff members petty cash to make transactions and having to chase this up and collect receipts and change, a pre-payment card usually comes with an online portal where a manager can see what has been purchased and the remaining budget on that card for the month. A manager may be able to see for example that a member of staff has spend £300 of their allotted £500 monthly allowance.

Higher levels of transparency and control – using E-procurement tools allows an organisation to track who is ordering what. For example, an e-requisitioning tool may allow Procurement Assistants to make purchases up to £500 but set an automatic escalation if they try to buy something of higher value. This allows for Management to have greater levels of visibility and more control over spending. Another example of transparency and control is in the use of e-sourcing tools to run a competitive tender exercise. All communication between the buyer and suppliers is tracked on the system and award letters can be sent via the system too. This reduces the risk of information being lost.

Environmental benefits- the use of e-procurement tools means that there is less paperwork involved. For example, rather than creating a physical PO which needs to be signed by a manager, an electronic system can allow a manager to sign-off the purchase by clicking a button. This means there is no requirement for the document to be printed. This saves paper and thus has a positive on the environment. Using electronic systems may help an organisation achieve their environmental targets.

In conclusion there are numerous benefits for procurement to adopt e-procurement tools. Depending on the sector and requirements of each individualised company, some advantages may be more pertinent than others, but it is undeniable that technology is helping to shape the industry into a value adding function of organisations.

Tutor Notes

- With an essay like this you could use subheadings and number the advantages if you like. It’s a good idea to do one advantage per paragraph and using formatting really helps the examiner to read your essay.

- study guide p.108

How to approach this question

- Sometimes CIPS give you a steer on how to answer the question. My advice is to follow it. The question says you MAY make reference to the following, but I’d use those hints as a guide for content- a paragraph on each and you’re done!

- When you’ve got a ‘may make reference to’ hint – this means you can completely ignore it and do your own thing and bring in your own ideas. May means it’s optional, so you wouldn’t be penalised for this. However, you have to consider the examiner’s mark scheme- it will detail options of stuff you can write for funding, ownership etc. Then there will be a line at the bottom saying something like ‘accept other options such as x and y’. This leaves it up to the examiner to decide whether what you’ve said is relevant. I’d personally not leave it up to chance you get a lenient examiner. If you write what’s definitely going to be on their mark scheme, you’re more likely to get more points.

Example Essay

The modern economy is a complex tapestry of various sectors, each with its own distinct characteristics and functions. The three prominent sectors are the public sector, the private sector, and the third sector. These sectors differ significantly in terms of their funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, the concept of shares, and their administration.

Firstly, the public sector is predominantly funded by the government through taxation, grants, and other forms of public revenue. Its very existence hinges on the provision of essential services and the fulfilment of societal needs. These organizations are owned by the government, be it at the federal, state, or local level. Unlike the private sector, the concept of shares doesn't apply in the public sector. Instead, the government allocates budgets to various departments and agencies for public services and projects. The primary objectives of the public sector revolve around the welfare of the citizens, including the provision ofeducation, healthcare, defence, and infrastructure. It is characterized by bureaucratic administration, with decision-making processes subject to governmental regulations and oversight. A prime example is public schools and healthcare systems, which are funded and operated by the government with the primary objective of ensuring universal access to education and healthcare services.

In contrast, the private sector operates on a starkly different paradigm. It is primarily funded by private capital, investment, and profit-seeking activities. Private individuals and corporations own these entities, with ownership shares often represented by stocks. Shareholders invest capital in exchange for ownership stakes and the potential for dividends. The central objective in the private sector is profit maximization, driven by competition in the market. Companies in the private sector are administered by management teams and boards of directors, with decisions guided by market forces. Apple and ExxonMobil are examples of private sector entities, privately owned and publicly traded, with profit motives at their core. Shareholders invest in these companies with the expectation of financial returns.

Lastly, the third sector, often referred to as the nonprofit or voluntary sector, represents a unique economic sphere. It relies on a combination of funding sources, including donations, grants, and earned income, but not taxation. Third sector organizations are not owned by individuals or shareholders; instead, they are governed by boards of directors or trustees. Unlike the private sectors, shares are not applicable in the third sector. These organizations do not seek to distribute profits to owners. The primary objective of the third sector is to serve a social or community purpose, such as addressing societal issues, promoting social change, and providing services that benefit the public. Administration in this sector is overseen by non-profit boards, and it heavily relies on volunteers, philanthropy, and community engagement. For example, the Red Cross operates with the objective of providing humanitarian aid and disaster relief, relying on donations and volunteers to fulfil its mission. Any profits that are made are reinvested into the organisation to further its mission.

In conclusion, the public, private, and third sectors represent diverse economic domains, each with its own funding mechanisms, ownership structures, objectives, and administrative models. These sectors play essential and complementary roles in society, contributing to economic development, public welfare, and social progress. Together, they form the foundation of a balanced and dynamic economic landscape.

Tutor Notes

- I’ve structured this essay with a paragraph on each sector, but you could have done a paragraph on each theme, thus having 5 paragraphs instead of 3. Either approach works.

- You’ve got 5 things and 3 sectors, that equals 15 marks. If you give an example of each and a strong intro and conclusion, that’s full marks.

- See LO 4.1 p. 203 – there’s a cute table with this information on.

How to approach this question.

- There’s many aspects to this question – make sure you’re answering them all:

- Explain what added value is and explain what ‘ensuring processes are compliant’ means (this could be your introduction) Added Value = achieving more for the same money. May be in producing an item cheaper, or by procuring additional features at no additional cost. Requires innovation and creativity. The focus is on the outcome. Compliant Processes – this is focusing on the process, rather than the outcome. Ensuring that purchases are made in line with internal and external rules/ procedures. This may be following Standard Operating Procedures, purchasing to strict budgets and the exclusive use of e-procurement tools.

- Explain the consequences of focusing on added value over compliance; can result in maverick spending, less visibility for management, may have additional risks if procuring items without following procedures – this may have legal and financial repercussions, Time-consuming, May lead to added expenses

- Consequences of focusing on compliance over added value; May foster a silo-mentality, Misses out on flexibility and agility, misses out on collaborative whole life costs reductions, Procurement function becomes rigid, inflexible and inwardly focused

- How both can be achieved; 1) Seek to add value only for certain purchases such as capital-expenditure items and not for others such as stationary.2) Ensure time is well-spent i.e. focus on added value for purchases where this can be most achieved, and focus on compliance where there is high risks. 3) Review processes regularly to ensure both goals are being achieved 4) Complete ‘lessons learned’ activities after big procurement activities to advise on future procurement activities- were both Added Value and Compliance achieved? How could this be improved next time?

- these three should form the main body of your essay. Above are many ideas you could explore, you won’t have time to talk about all of them so pick a couple that resonate with you

Conclusion – the balance is important

Example Essay

Added value refers to the extra worth or enhancement a company provides to a product, service, or process that goes beyond the intrinsic value inherent in the initial input. It represents the additional benefits or features that make a product or service more desirable to customers, often justifying a higher price or distinguishing it from competitors. Procurement often look to achieve added value in procurement activities but achieving this whilst remaining compliant (adhering to established laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies) can be tricky. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between pursuing added value and ensuring stringent compliance in procurement activities is pivotal. This essay explores the consequences of emphasizing one area over the other and outlines strategies for organizations to successfully navigate the dual goals of attaining added value and maintaining compliance.

Consequences of Focusing Solely on Added Value:

Prioritizing added value without due consideration for compliance can expose an organization to a myriad of risks. One notable consequence is the potential compromise of regulatory requirements and legal standards. For instance, if a procurement team is solely driven by obtaining cost-effective solutions or innovative products, they may inadvertently overlook compliance with industry-specific regulations, leading to legal ramifications and reputational damage.

Moreover, an exclusive focus on added value may neglect crucial ethical considerations. An organization, in pursuit of cost savings or improved efficiency, might engage with suppliers that violate ethical standards or engage in unethical business practices such as modern day slavery. Such associations can tarnish the organization's reputation, eroding the trust of stakeholders and customers alike.

Consequences of Overemphasizing Compliance:

Conversely, a hyper-focus on compliance without adequate consideration for added value can result in missed opportunities and suboptimal outcomes. Strict adherence to procedural norms and regulations might lead to an overly bureaucratic procurement process, hindering innovation and stifling the organization's ability to adapt swiftly to market changes.

Furthermore, an excessive emphasis on compliance might limit engagement with suppliers, stifling creativity and potential breakthroughs. For instance, a procurement team rigidly adhering to compliance protocols might miss out on collaborating with smaller, innovative suppliers that could offer unique and value-added solutions.

Strategies for Achieving Both Added Value and Compliance:

To navigate the delicate balance between added value and compliance, organizations can adopt several strategic approaches. First and foremost, an organization should establish clear procurement policies and procedures that incorporate both compliance requirements and avenues for seeking added value. This ensures that all procurement activities align with regulatory standards while leaving room for innovation.

Effective supplier management plays a pivotal role in achieving this balance. By thoroughly vetting and categorizing suppliers based on their ability to deliver value and comply with regulations, organizations can strategically align their procurement activities. For example,suppliers that have a proven track record of compliance can be trusted with critical components, while those offering innovative solutions may be engaged for projects that prioritize added value.

Leveraging technology is another essential strategy. Implementing advanced procurement software that integrates compliance checks and offers analytics for value assessment can significantly enhance the efficiency of procurement processes. Automated systems can streamline due diligence, ensuring that suppliers meet compliance standards while providing insights into their potential to deliver added value.

Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration within the procurement team and across organizational departments is crucial. Encouraging open communication enables different stakeholders to contribute insights on compliance and added value. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that procurement decisions align with broader organizational goals and values.

In conclusion, the strategic balancing act between achieving added value and ensuring compliance in procurement is indispensable for organizational success. By recognizing the consequences of favouring one area over the other and adopting a holistic approach, this safeguards against risks but also positions the organization for sustained growth and competitiveness in the ever-evolving business landscape.

Tutor Notes:

- Examples highlight that you understand the material you have studied and can apply it to real life scenarios. You could take a certain industry or organisation and explain the consequences for them of focusing on one over the other. E.g. In the construction industry it is very important that organisations achieve compliance in their procurement activities. This includes ensuring there are robust contracts in place and that legislation such as CDM and Health and Safety is followed. When procuring a construction contract the danger of focusing on Added Value over compliance is that this may result in key legislation being forgotten which leads to legal proceedings against the buyer. For example, if the buyer procures a construction contract without fulfilling the responsibilities outlined in the CDM and H&S regulations, this can result in huge fines for the company and potential jail time for senior management.

- The risk of focusing on compliance over added value may be in missing out on alternative proposals. For example, if a buyer is procuring a construction project of a new hospital and they focus too much on compliance, they may not engage in Early Supplier Involvement or cross-functional working which may bring up alternative ideas such as different ways the hospital could be built. The alternative ideas may result in higher quality or cost savings which are missed by the buyer. This results in a more costly, or lower-quality hospital being built.

- Overall, what CIPS are testing you on here is that you understand that the procurement department should aim to achieve both – it’s a balancing act between compliance and added value and this could be viewed as a pendulum- it’s important not to swing too heavily in one direction. That’s actually a really good metaphor – feel free to use that in your conclusion!

- study guide p. 114