PECB Certified NIS 2 Directive Lead Implementer NIS-2-Directive-Lead-Implementer Exam Questions with Experts Answers Updated Recently

Scenario 2:

MHospital, founded in 2005 in Metropolis, has become a healthcare industry leader with over 2,000 dedicated employees known for its commitment to qualitative medical services and patient care innovation. With the rise of cyberattacks targeting healthcare institutions, MHospital acknowledged the need for a comprehensive cyber strategy to mitigate risks effectively and ensure patient safety and data security. Hence, it decided to implement the NIS 2 Directive requirements. To avoid creating additional processes that do not fit the company’s context and culture, MHospital decided to integrate the Directive’s requirements into its existing processes. To initiate the implementation of the Directive, the company decided to conduct a gap analysis to assess the current state of the cybersecurity measures against the requirements outlined in the NIS 2 Directive and then identify opportunities for closing the gap.

Recognizing the indispensable role of a computer security incident response team (CSIRT) in maintaining a secure network environment, MHospital empowers its CSIRT to conduct thorough penetration testing on the company’s networks. This rigorous testing helps identify vulnerabilities with a potentially significant impact and enables the implementation of robust security measures. The CSIRT monitors threats and vulnerabilities at the national level and assists MHospital regarding real-time monitoring of their network and information systems. MHospital also conducts cooperative evaluations of security risks within essential supply chains for critical ICT services and systems. Collaborating with interested parties, it engages in the assessment of security risks, contributing to a collective effort to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector against cyber threats.

To ensure compliance with the NIS 2 Directive’s reporting requirements, MHospital has streamlined its incident reporting process. In the event of a security incident, the company is committed to issuing an official notification within four days of identifying the incident to ensure that prompt actions are taken to mitigate the impact of incidents and maintain the integrity of patient data and healthcare operations. MHospital’s dedication to implementing the NIS 2 Directive extends to cyber strategy and governance. The company has established robust cyber risk management and compliance protocols, aligning its cybersecurity initiatives with its overarching business objectives.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Is the role of the MHospital’s CSIRT regarding vulnerability assessment in alignment with the requirements of Article 11 of the NIS 2 Directive?

Scenario 3: Founded in 2001, SafePost is a prominent postal and courier company headquartered in Brussels, Belguim. Over the years, it has become a key player in the logistics and courier in the region. With more than 500 employees, the company prides itself on its efficient and reliable services, catering to individual and corporate clients. SafePost has recognized the importance of cybersecurity in an increasingly digital world and has taken significant steps to align its operations with regulatory directives, such as the NIS 2 Directive.

SafePost recognized the importance of thoroughly analyzing market forces and opportunities to inform its cybersecurity strategy. Hence, it selected an approach that enabled the analysis of market forces and opportunities in the four following areas: political, economic, social, and technological. The results of the analysis helped SafePost in anticipating emerging threats and aligning its security measures with the evolving landscape of the postal and courier industry.

To comply with the NIS 2 Directive requirements, SafePost has implemented comprehensive cybersecurity measures and procedures, which have been documented and communicated in training sessions. However, these procedures are used only on individual initiatives and have still not been implemented throughout the company. Furthermore, SafePost’s risk management team has developed and approved several cybersecurity risk management measures to help the company minimize potential risks, protect customer data, and ensure business continuity.

Additionally, SafePost has developed a cybersecurity policy that contains guidelines and procedures for safeguarding digital assets, protecting sensitive data, and defining the roles and responsibilities of employees in maintaining security. This policy will help the company by providing a structured framework for identifying and mitigating cybersecurity risks, ensuring compliance with regulations, and fostering a culture of security awareness among employees, ultimately enhancing overall cybersecurity posture and reducing the likelihood of cyber incidents.

As SafePost continues to navigate the dynamic market forces and opportunities, it remains committed to upholding the highest standards of cybersecurity to safeguard the interests of its customers and maintain its position as a trusted leader in the postal and courier industry.

Based on scenario 3, which of the following approaches was used by SafePost to analyze market forces and opportunities?

Scenario 8: FoodSafe Corporation is a well-known food manufacturing company in Vienna, Austria, which specializes in producing diverse products, from savory snacks to artisanal desserts. As the company operates in regulatory environment subject to this NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has employed a variety of techniques for cybersecurity testing to safeguard the integrity and security of its food production processes.

To conduct an effective vulnerability assessment process, FoodSafe Corporation utilizes a vulnerability assessment tool to discover vulnerabilities on network hosts such as servers and workstations. Additionally, FoodSafe Corporation has made a deliberate effort to define clear testing objectives and obtain top management approval during the discovery phase. This structured approach ensures that vulnerability assessments are conducted with clear objectives and that the management team is actively engaged and supports the assessment process, reinforcing the company’s commitment to cybersecurity excellence.

In alignment with the NIS 2 Directive, FoodSafe Corporation has incorporated audits into its core activities, starting with an internal assessment followed by an additional audit conducted by its partners. To ensure the effectiveness of these audits, the company meticulously identified operational sectors, procedures, and policies. However, FoodSafe Corporation did not utilize an organized audit timetable as part of its internal compliance audit process. While FoodSafe’s Corporation organizational chart does not clearly indicate the audit team’s position, the internal audit process is well-structured. Auditors familiarize themselves with established policies and procedures to gain a comprehensive understanding of their workflow. They engage in discussions with employees further to enhance their insights, ensuring no critical details are overlooked.

Subsequently, FoodSafe Corporation’s auditors generate a comprehensive report of findings, serving as the foundation for necessary changes and improvements within the company. Auditors also follow up on action plans in response to nonconformities and improvement opportunities.

The company recently expanded its offerings by adding new products and services, which had an impact on its cybersecurity program. This required the cybersecurity team to adapt and ensure that these additions were integrated securely into their existing framework. FoodSafe Corporation commitment to enhancing its monitoring and measurement processes to ensure product quality and operational efficiency. In doing so, the company carefully considers its target audience and selects suitable methods for reporting monitoring and measurement results. This incudes incorporating additional graphical elements and labeling of endpoints in their reports to provide a clearer and more intuitive representation of data, ultimately facilitating better decision-making within the organization.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following questions:

Which vulnerability assessment tool did FoodSafe Corporation use?

What information does NOT have to be included in an asset inventory for effective asset management?