Zscaler Updated ZDTE Exam Questions and Answers by agnes

Official EDU-202 materials describe the Engineer path as focusing on advanced architecture, connectivity, platform, access control, cyberthreat protection, data protection, risk management, ZDX, and Zero Trust Automation. The published learning outcomes explicitly include: discussing the architecture of the Zscaler platform and its API infrastructure; configuring advanced connectivity options; and configuring advanced cybersecurity services and Zscaler Digital Experience (ZDX)—including application monitoring, call quality, probes, diagnostics, alerts, and role-based administration. These map directly to options A, C, and D, which align to Zscaler Architecture, Cyberthreat/Access Control Services (IPS, DNS Control, Tenant Restrictions, segmentation), and ZDX content in the EDU-202 outline.

By contrast, Client Connector App Store “version enablement” and controlling which build is available when users manually or automatically update the app is documented as an administration task in the Client Connector help and is typically taught in the Essentials/Administrator (EDU-200) path, not in the Engineer path. Those materials show how to use the App Store to enable builds and control available versions, positioning it as operational client management rather than an advanced Engineer-level topic. Consequently, option B is considered out of scope for EDU-202 in the ZDTE context.

===========

Top of Form

Zscaler positions global peering as a core part of delivering low-latency, high-performance access to SaaS and internet destinations. In Zscaler architecture and Microsoft 365 best-practices material, Zscaler explicitly states that it operates an open peering policy, meaning it is willing to peer with any content or service provider that meets standard technical requirements.

Training content used for ZDTE further emphasizes that Zscaler peers broadly with major ISPs, cloud providers, and internet exchanges to minimize hops and improve user experience. Flashcard material summarizing the architecture notes directly that Zscaler’s peering stance is an “open peering policy,” allowing anyone to request connectivity into the Zero Trust Exchange.

Options suggesting Zscaler refuses new peers, restricts to a small list, or has no defined policy contradict this documented approach and would undermine its ability to optimize traffic paths globally. Because the official guidance clearly describes peering as open and inclusive of any qualified provider, the correct choice is that Zscaler has an open peering policy and will peer with any content or service provider.

A subcloud in Zscaler is defined as a subset of ZIA Public Service Edges (data centers) that you group together and associate with specific locations or traffic. Conceptually, it is a logical “pool” of preferred Public Service Edges. When a user or site is mapped to a given subcloud, their traffic is steered only to that selected subset of Service Edges instead of any available data center in the wider cloud.

The main benefit of this design is control and predictability: you can guarantee that web traffic is forwarded to your preferred ZIA Public Service Edges, which is critical when you must keep egress IPs stable for SaaS allow-lists, regulatory requirements, or local data-residency mandates. Subclouds also help with operational resilience, because you can temporarily exclude problematic data centers from a subcloud without changing overall forwarding methods, ensuring continuity while still using your defined group of Service Edges. They do not increase the number of Service Edges, replace ZIA Public Service Edges, or directly affect IP geolocation precision. Therefore, option C correctly captures the primary benefit expected in the ZDTE/EDU-202 context.

===========

The Domain Joined posture element in ZPA evaluates whether a device belongs to a specific Active Directory domain. ZPA performs this evaluation using the device’s local posture signals, either through the Zscaler Client Connector posture engine or through the browser-based posture evaluation framework used in ZPA Browser Access. When a user connects via Browser Access, ZPA can still determine domain membership by inspecting the allowed browser posture attributes provided by the endpoint, enabling device-based Zero Trust controls without requiring a full Client Connector installation.

Linux endpoints do not support domain-joined posture verification, making option A incorrect. Domain join validation is performed at the device level, not through the Identity Provider, because IdPs validate users, not device domain status, eliminating option D. ZPA’s posture configuration allows you to define multiple domains within a single posture profile, so creating a second posture profile is unnecessary, making option C incorrect.

Therefore, the correct statement is that ZPA Browser Access can determine whether the device is joined to the specified domain, which aligns with the expected behavior of the domain-joined posture element.