Juniper Updated JN0-364 Exam Questions and Answers by boris

TheBorder Gateway Protocol (BGP)operates based on a strict set of advertisement rules designed to prevent routing loops while ensuring global reachability. These rules differ significantly depending on whether the relationship isExternal BGP (EBGP)orInternal BGP (IBGP).

1. EBGP Advertisement (Option A):In a standard EBGP scenario, a router acts as an exit/entry point for an Autonomous System. When an EBGP speaker receives a valid route from any peer (Internal or External), it will, by default, advertise that route to all of its other EBGP peers. This is the primary mechanism that allows prefixes to propagate across the global internet from one AS to another.

2. IBGP Split Horizon (Option D):

The most critical rule within an AS is theIBGP Split Horizonrule. To prevent loops within an AS, BGP dictates that a route learned from an IBGP peermust notbe advertised to any other IBGP peer. This is why BGP requires a "full mesh" of IBGP sessions or the use ofRoute Reflectorsto ensure all internal routers learn all routes. Without this rule, a route could circulate infinitely within the AS because IBGP does not update the AS_PATH attribute.

3. EBGP to IBGP Propagation (Option B):

When a router learns a route from an EBGP peer, it is permitted to advertise that route to all of its IBGP peers. This ensures that everyone inside the network knows how to reach external destinations. However, it is important to remember that in Junos OS, theBGP Next Hopis not modified by default when sending routes to IBGP peers, often requiring a "next-hop-self" policy to ensure internal reachability.

Options C and E are incorrect because they directly contradict these fundamental BGP loop-prevention and propagation mechanisms.

In a Juniper Networks environment, deployingRSVP-signaled LSPsrequires a functionalTraffic Engineering Database (TED). This database is populated by the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) using specific extensions that carry link-state information beyond simple reachability, such as available bandwidth, administrative groups (link coloring), and Maximum Reservable Bandwidth.

The behavior of these extensions differs betweenOSPFandIS-ISin Junos OS:

OSPF (Option C):By default, OSPF is a "pure" routing protocol. To support RSVP-TE, it must carry Opaque LSAs (Type 10). According to Juniper documentation, you mustexplicitly configuretraffic engineering within the OSPF protocol hierarchy using the set protocols ospf traffic-engineering command. Without this command, OSPF will not flood the TE information required by the Constrained Shortest Path First (CSPF) algorithm, and LSPs will fail to establish.

IS-IS (Option D):IS-IS was designed to be extensible through the use of TLVs (Type, Length, Value). In Junos OS,IS-IS traffic engineering extensions are enabled by defaultonce the protocol is active. As soon as you enable IS-IS on an interface, it begins to advertise the wide metrics and TE TLVs (like TLV 22 and 135) necessary for building the TED.

This distinction is a common design consideration for network architects. While IS-IS simplifies the rollout of MPLS by having TE enabled "out of the box," OSPF requires that extra configuration step to transition from a standard IGP to a TE-aware protocol.

One of the most significant architectural improvements in IPv6 is the move from a complex, variable-length header (as seen in IPv4) to a streamlined, fixed-length base header of 40 bytes. Additional functionality that was previously handled by "Options" in IPv4 is now moved toExtension Headers, which are inserted between the IPv6 base header and the upper-layer protocol (TCP/UDP).

According to Juniper Networks technical documentation and RFC 8200, the following are valid IPv6 Extension Headers:

Hop-by-Hop Options (Option B):This header carries optional information that must be examined by every node along the delivery path. It is used for features like the Router Alert and Jumbo Payload options.

Fragment (Option E):Unlike IPv4, where any router can fragment a packet, in IPv6, fragmentation is performed only by the source node. The Fragment header contains the information necessary for the destination to reassemble the packet (Offset, Identification, and More Fragments flag).

Destination Options (Option A):This header carries information intended only for the destination node. It can appear twice: once before a routing header and once after.

Why other options are incorrect:

Protocol (Option C):In IPv4, this was a field in the header. In IPv6, this is replaced by theNext Headerfield, which identifies the type of the following header (whether it's an extension header or the upper-layer protocol).

Header Checksum (Option D):This field was entirely removed in IPv6. IPv6 relies on the data link layer (Ethernet) and the transport layer (TCP/UDP) to perform error detection, significantly reducing the processing overhead for routers in the core of a service provider network.

In the context of Juniper Networks High Availability,Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)is a lightweight protocol designed to provide fast failure detection for the forwarding path. Unlike the slow "hello" mechanisms found in IGPs like OSPF or IS-IS, BFD can detect link or neighbor failures in sub-second intervals.

According to Juniper Networks technical documentation, BFD operates through a negotiation process. When two routers establish a BFD session, they exchange their locally configuredMinimum Transmit IntervalandMinimum Receive Intervalwithin the BFD control packets. The fundamental rule of BFD negotiation is that the routers must agree on a common timing value that accommodates the slower of the two devices to ensure stability and prevent "false positives" (detecting a failure when none exists simply because one router cannot keep up with the processing speed).

In this scenario, R1 expects to send at 300ms, while R2 is configured for 400ms. During the handshake, R1 informs R2 it is capable of 300ms, but R2 informs R1 it can only support a minimum of 400ms. Consequently, the routers will negotiate to use theslowest of the two rates (400ms). Specifically, the transmission interval of one router is matched to the receive interval of the other. By choosing the highest common denominator (the slowest rate), the BFD session ensures that both routers have sufficient time to process incoming control packets. This negotiation allows BFD to be highly flexible in heterogeneous environments where different hardware platforms may have varying CPU capabilities for handling rapid heartbeat packets.