Isaca Updated IT-Risk-Fundamentals Exam Questions and Answers by adalyn

Risk analysis is used to estimate the frequency and magnitude of a given risk scenario. Here’s the breakdown:

Risk Analysis: This process involves identifying and evaluating risks to estimate their likelihood (frequency) and potential impact (magnitude). It includes both qualitative and quantitative methods to understand the nature of risks and their potential consequences.

Risk Register: This is a tool used to document risks, including their characteristics and management strategies. It does not perform the analysis itself but records the results of the risk analysis process.

Risk Governance: This refers to the framework and processes for managing risks at an enterprise level. It includes the policies, procedures, and structures to ensure effective risk management but does not directly involve estimating frequency and magnitude.

Therefore, risk analysis is the correct method for estimating the frequency and magnitude of a risk scenario.

The most useful information to include in a risk report regarding control effectiveness is whether the controls are functioning as intended to reduce risk to acceptable levels. This directly addresses the core purpose of controls.

While alignment with standards (B) is important, it doesn't guarantee effectiveness. Confirmation of deficiencies by external audits (C) is relevant, but the primary focus is on whether controls are working.

To establish an enterprise risk appetite, it is essential for an organization to establish risk tolerance for each business unit. Risk tolerance defines the specific level of risk that each business unit is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. This approach ensures that risk management is tailored to the unique context and operational realities of different parts of the organization, enabling a more precise and effective risk management strategy. Normalizing risk taxonomy and aggregating risk statements are important steps in the broader risk management process but establishing risk tolerance is fundamental for defining risk appetite at the unit level. This concept is supported by standards such as ISO 31000 and frameworks like COSO ERM (Enterprise Risk Management)​​.

The main advantage of a risk taxonomy is that it provides a structured framework for classifying and categorizing risks. This helps ensure that all relevant risks are identified and considered in a consistent manner. It provides a common language and structure for discussing and analyzing risks.

While a taxonomy can support risk quantification (A), it doesn't enable it on its own. Alignment with best practices (C) is a benefit of using a good taxonomy, but not the primary advantage of the taxonomy itself.